These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16725171)

  • 1. An ideal observer analysis of variability in visual-only speech.
    Conrey B; Gold JM
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3243-58. PubMed ID: 16725171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual phonemic ambiguity and speechreading.
    Lidestam B; Beskow J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):835-47. PubMed ID: 16908878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photorealistic speech agents and facially expressive robots.
    Frenger P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():191-6. PubMed ID: 9603037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of speech spectrograms.
    Greene BG; Pisoni DB; Carrell TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 6747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Chang YP; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
    Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling methods for identifying differences in source reliability.
    Montgomery DA
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 11277447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.