139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16725225)
1. Quantification of pore clogging characteristics in potential permeable reactive barrier (PRB) substrates using image analysis.
Wantanaphong J; Mooney SJ; Bailey EH
J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Aug; 86(3-4):299-320. PubMed ID: 16725225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbially mediated clinoptilolite regeneration in a multifunctional permeable reactive barrier used to remove ammonium from landfill leachate contamination: laboratory column evaluation.
Nooten TV; Diels L; Bastiaens L
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3486-92. PubMed ID: 20387879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory study on sequenced permeable reactive barrier remediation for landfill leachate-contaminated groundwater.
Jun D; Yongsheng Z; Weihong Z; Mei H
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jan; 161(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 18479811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferential flow path development and its influence on long-term PRB performance: column study.
Kamolpornwijit W; Liang L; West OR; Moline GR; Sullivan AB
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Nov; 66(3-4):161-78. PubMed ID: 14568397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of chemical conditioning on the ion exchange capacity and on kinetic of zinc uptake by clinoptilolite.
Athanasiadis K; Helmreich B
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1527-32. PubMed ID: 15878024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of multi-permeable reactive barriers for long term removal of mixed contaminants.
Lee JY; Lee KJ; Youm SY; Lee MR; Kamala-Kannan S; Oh BT
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010 Feb; 84(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 19949770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage.
Logan MV; Reardon KF; Figueroa LA; McLain JE; Ahmann DM
Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4537-51. PubMed ID: 16213004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A calcite permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of Fluoride from spent potliner (SPL) contaminated groundwater.
Turner BD; Binning PJ; Sloan SW
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jan; 95(3-4):110-20. PubMed ID: 17913284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB).
Gibert O; Pomierny S; Rowe I; Kalin RM
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(16):7587-96. PubMed ID: 18353637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous removal of Cu, Mn and Zn from drinking water with the use of clinoptilolite and its Fe-modified form.
Doula MK
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3659-72. PubMed ID: 19576609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Porous structure of natural and modified clinoptilolites.
Kowalczyk P; Sprynskyy M; Terzyk AP; Lebedynets M; Namieśnik J; Buszewski B
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2006 May; 297(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 16310211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation.
Higgins MR; Olson TM
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9432-8. PubMed ID: 20000540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance assessment of a zeolite treatment wall for removing Sr-90 from groundwater.
Rabideau AJ; Van Benschoten J; Patel A; Bandilla K
J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Sep; 79(1-2):1-24. PubMed ID: 16061306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrogeochemical and biological processes affecting the long-term performance of an iron-based permeable reactive barrier.
Zolla V; Freyria FS; Sethi R; Di Molfetta A
J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(3):897-908. PubMed ID: 19329678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of aqueous iron(II) and manganese(II) in sub-aqueous active barrier systems containing natural clinoptilolite.
Jacobs PH; Waite TD
Chemosphere; 2004 Jan; 54(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 14575744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploration of remediation of acid rock drainage with clinoptilolite as sorbent in a slurry bubble column for both heavy metal capture and regeneration.
Cui H; Li LY; Grace JR
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3359-66. PubMed ID: 16962631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remediation of RDX- and HMX-contaminated groundwater using organic mulch permeable reactive barriers.
Ahmad F; Schnitker SP; Newell CJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Feb; 90(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 17067719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of two low-cost adsorption media for removal of toxic metals from contaminated water.
Somerville R; Norrström AC
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(4):935-42. PubMed ID: 19700832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on zero-valent iron reactive barrier performance: a field investigation.
Liang L; Moline GR; Kamolpornwijit W; West OR
J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Nov; 80(1-2):71-91. PubMed ID: 16126304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
