184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16728352)
1. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
Langley LS; Blackston JW
J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Trespalacios MJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
King M
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
Waldman EA
Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
Cuva AJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce.
Windsor KH
Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
Sieck WA
Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
Malo PE
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
Fleming NA
Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
Crockin SL
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parenthood, genes, and gametes: the family law and trusts and estates perspectives.
Cahn NR
Univ Memphis Law Rev; 2002; 32(3):563-606. PubMed ID: 16526142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
Kaplan S
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fertilization and consent agreements: where does California stand?
Ellis M
Santa Clara Law Rev; 2002; 42(4):1191-225. PubMed ID: 15212074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B.
Issa F
Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby contracts.
Kwok CS
Yale Law J; 2001 May; 110(7):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12741373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryo donation: unresolved legal issues in the transfer of surplus cryopreserved embryos.
Kindregan CP; McBrien M
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(1):169-206. PubMed ID: 16485374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches.
Daar JF
J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
Waldman EA
Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
Triber GA
Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
