262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16729498)
1. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants.
Misch CE
Dent Today; 2006 May; 25(5):80, 82, 84-5; quiz 85. PubMed ID: 16729498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants.
Misch CE
Dent Today; 2002 Sep; 21(9):76-81. PubMed ID: 12271847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design, maintenance and biomechanical considerations in implant placement.
Rangert B; Sennerby L; Meredith N; Brunski J
Dent Update; 1997 Dec; 24(10):416-20. PubMed ID: 9534417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use.
Misch CE
Dent Today; 2005 Aug; 24(8):64-6, 68. PubMed ID: 16161821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient.
Curtis DA; Sharma A; Finzen FC; Kao RT
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 28(10):771-9. PubMed ID: 11326520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-protected occlusion.
Misch CE; Bides MW
Int J Dent Symp; 1994; 2(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9117850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry.
Pita MS; Anchieta RB; Barão VA; Garcia IR; Pedrazzi V; Assunção WG
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 22134269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale.
Kim Y; Oh TJ; Misch CE; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 15642028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of fractured dental implants: a case report.
Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Neves FD
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 19212233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using sound dental principles to salvage the compromised implant case.
Carrick J; Storum KA
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Oct; 42(4):781-8, xi. PubMed ID: 9891657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegrated implant fracture: causes and treatment.
Gealh WC; Mazzo V; Barbi F; Camarini ET
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 20553152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
