These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16730405)

  • 1. Cardiovascular response to Stroop: effect of verbal response and task difficulty.
    Boutcher YN; Boutcher SH
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 16730405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of skeletal muscle vasodilatation responses to Stroop mental challenge over repeated sessions.
    Hamer M; Boutcher YN; Park Y; Boutcher SH
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 16698164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heart-rate and blood-pressure responses to speech alone compared with cognitive challenges in the Stroop task.
    Stein PK; Boutcher SH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Oct; 77(2):555-63. PubMed ID: 8247679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.
    van Veen V; Carter CS
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incentive effects on cardiovascular reactivity in active coping with unclear task difficulty.
    Richter M; Gendolla GH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 16318893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer's disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in the Stroop test.
    Amieva H; Lafont S; Rouch-Leroyer I; Rainville C; Dartigues JF; Orgogozo JM; Fabrigoule C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 15288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: evidence from a bilingual stroop task.
    Mohamed Zied K; Phillipe A; Pinon K; Havet-Thomassin V; Aubin G; Roy A; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 15050787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task.
    Thomas SJ; Johnstone SJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Mar; 63(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 17123655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses.
    Blais C; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1345-53. PubMed ID: 17154776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiac response of trained and untrained males to a repeated psychological stressor.
    Boutcher SH; Nugent FW
    Behav Med; 1993; 19(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8219526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.
    Badzakova-Trajkov G; Barnett KJ; Waldie KE; Kirk IJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():139-48. PubMed ID: 19084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.