BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16731542)

  • 1. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A; Ufuk Toygar T; Abuhijleh E
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
    Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion.
    Pavoni C; Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Polimeni A; Cozza P
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19506743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19524838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions of protraction and rapid palatal expansion in Class III malocclusion subjects.
    Kilinç AS; Arslan SG; Kama JD; Ozer T; Dari O
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 17906307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients.
    O'Grady PW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16905065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.
    Isci D; Turk T; Elekdag-Turk S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):706-15. PubMed ID: 20457582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 11029736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Mucedero M; Cozza P
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 19752018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment effects of bonded RME and vertical-pull chincup followed by fixed appliance in patients with increased vertical dimension.
    Schulz SO; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):326-36. PubMed ID: 16168329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.