223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16732374)
1. Influence of specific alternative diagnoses on the probability of pulmonary embolism.
Testuz A; Le Gal G; Righini M; Bounameaux H; Perrier A
Thromb Haemost; 2006 Jun; 95(6):958-62. PubMed ID: 16732374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suspicion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients: nonspecific chest pain is the most frequent alternative diagnosis.
Bernard Bagattini S; Bounameaux H; Perneger T; Perrier A
J Intern Med; 2004 Aug; 256(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 15257728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The probability of pulmonary embolism is a function of the diagnoses considered most likely before testing.
Kabrhel C; McAfee AT; Goldhaber SZ
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Apr; 13(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 16531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.
Moores LK; Collen JF; Woods KM; Shorr AF
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15081559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Value and role of clinical findings in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism].
Leroyer C; Mottier D
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Nov; 88(11 Suppl):1693-8. PubMed ID: 8815828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: a comparison of clinical probability scores.
Hogg K; Thomas D; Mackway-Jones K; Lecky F; Cruickshank K
Br J Haematol; 2011 Apr; 153(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 21371002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
Kabrhel C
J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].
Ulukavak Ciftçi T; Köktürk N; Demir N; Oğuzülgen KI; Ekim N
Tuberk Toraks; 2005; 53(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 16258884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simple and accurate prediction of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Miniati M; Bottai M; Monti S; Salvadori M; Serasini L; Passera M
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2008 Aug; 178(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 18436792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinician gestalt estimate of pretest probability for acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism in patients with chest pain and dyspnea.
Kline JA; Stubblefield WB
Ann Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 63(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 24070658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Desquamative interstitial pneumonia masquerading as acute life-threatening pulmonary embolism.
Behnia MM; Cummings OW
Am J Crit Care; 2004 May; 13(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 15149053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulmonary embolism in adolescents.
Ma QB; Yao WZ; Chen JM; Ge HX; Li S; Zheng YA
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Mar; 125(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 22613536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of an aging population on the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: comparison of young and elderly patients.
Castelli R; Bergamaschini L; Sailis P; Pantaleo G; Porro F
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2009 Feb; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 18160565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule.
Goekoop RJ; Steeghs N; Niessen RW; Jonkers GJ; Dik H; Castel A; Werker-van Gelder L; Vlasveld LT; van Klink RC; Planken EV; Huisman MV
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Jan; 97(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 17200782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High D-dimer levels increase the likelihood of pulmonary embolism.
Tick LW; Nijkeuter M; Kramer MH; Hovens MM; Büller HR; Leebeek FW; Huisman MV;
J Intern Med; 2008 Aug; 264(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18452520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.
Wolf SJ; McCubbin TR; Nordenholz KE; Naviaux NW; Haukoos JS
Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 26(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18272098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.
Penaloza A; Mélot C; Dochy E; Blocklet D; Gevenois PA; Wautrecht JC; Lheureux P; Motte S
Thromb Res; 2007; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Djurabi RK; Klok FA; Nijkeuter M; Kaasjager K; Kamphuisen PW; Kramer MH; Kruip MJ; Leebeek FW; Büller HR; Huisman MV
Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The epidemiology and diagnostic approach to acute pulmonary embolism in the university hospital.
Sharma M; Degoricija V; Legac A; Gradiser M; Vucicević Z
Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 19408604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
