161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16732627)
1. Surgical Interbody Research Group--radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery.
Burkus JK; Foley K; Haid RW; LeHuec JC
Neurosurg Focus; 2001 Apr; 10(4):E11. PubMed ID: 16732627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion.
Fogel GR; Toohey JS; Neidre A; Brantigan JW
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 17544854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic changes in patients with pseudarthrosis after posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis using carbon interbody cages: a prospective five-year study.
Kanemura T; Matsumoto A; Ishikawa Y; Yamaguchi H; Satake K; Ito Z; Yoshida G; Sakai Y; Imagama S; Kawakami N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(10):e82. PubMed ID: 24875034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report.
Sharma AK; Kepler CK; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Huang RC; Sama AA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 20844451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Cook SD; Patron LP; Christakis PM; Bailey KJ; Banta C; Glazer PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 May; 29(10):1118-23. PubMed ID: 15131440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial.
Brantigan JW; Steffee AD; Lewis ML; Quinn LM; Persenaire JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(11):1437-46. PubMed ID: 10828927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of stress distribution in lumbar interbody fusion.
Kumar N; Judith MR; Kumar A; Mishra V; Robert MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1731-5. PubMed ID: 16094274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.
Santos ER; Goss DG; Morcom RK; Fraser RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 12768137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.
Tsantrizos A; Baramki HG; Zeidman S; Steffen T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1899-907. PubMed ID: 10908932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2.
Burkus JK; Dorchak JD; Sanders DL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 12590213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique.
Rao PJ; Maharaj MM; Phan K; Lakshan Abeygunasekara M; Mobbs RJ
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 25543011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar interbody fusion using tapered cages.
Rao RD; David KS; Wang M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2772-6. PubMed ID: 16371901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Burkus JK; Transfeldt EE; Kitchel SH; Watkins RG; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2396-408. PubMed ID: 12438990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
