These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [The risks associated with the wish for a caesarean section]. Feige A Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2004 Oct; 208(5):163-4. PubMed ID: 15508048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Elective cesarean section for all twin pregnancies: logical step or dangerous turn?]. Winer N Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):587. PubMed ID: 17553722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Choosing caesarean section. Wagner M Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2001; (57):26-9. PubMed ID: 12596403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal timing of elective cesarean delivery for twins. Suzuki S; Inde Y J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(6):552-3. PubMed ID: 18673082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should maternal choice be an indication for caesarean section? Duckworth S Int J Surg; 2008 Aug; 6(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 18178139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request": was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise? Young D Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 16948716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Puerperal complications following elective Cesarean sections for twin pregnancies. Simões T; Aboim L; Costa A; Ambrosio A; Alves S; Blickstein I J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 17302518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]