These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16733227)

  • 1. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
    Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
    Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.
    Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
    Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
    Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care.
    Nietert PJ; Wessell AM; Feifer C; Ornstein SM
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Feb; 19(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 16448884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. End-digit preference and the quality of blood pressure monitoring in diabetic adults.
    Kim ES; Samuels TA; Yeh HC; Abuid M; Marinopoulos SS; McCauley JM; Brancati FL
    Diabetes Care; 2007 Aug; 30(8):1959-63. PubMed ID: 17485575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurement in ambulatory physician practices.
    Campbell NR; Culleton BW; McKay DW
    Am J Hypertens; 2005 Dec; 18(12 Pt 1):1522-7. PubMed ID: 16364819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.
    Ayodele OE; Sanya EO; Okunola OO; Akintunde AA
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Mar; 23(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 22447477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
    de Lusignan S; Belsey J; Hague N; Dzregah B
    J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Apr; 18(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 15037875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN).
    McLean DL; McAlister FA; Johnson JA; King KM; Makowsky MJ; Jones CA; Tsuyuki RT;
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 168(21):2355-61. PubMed ID: 19029501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Definition of hypertension: the impact of number of visits for blood pressure measurement.
    Figueiredo D; Azevedo A; Pereira M; de Barros H
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2009; 28(7-8):775-83. PubMed ID: 19894656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of the white-coat phenomenon in patients with primary hypertension.
    Zhu N; Bu M; Chen D; Li T; Qian J; Yu Q; Chen Q; Wan C; Qu H; Zhu M; Zou X
    Hypertens Res; 2008 Jan; 31(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 18360016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements. WHO Monica Project [corrected].
    Hense HW; Kuulasmaa K; Zaborskis A; Kupsc W; Tuomilehto J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1990; 38(5-6):463-8. PubMed ID: 2082452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reliability of arterial blood pressure measurement in an arterial hypertension study].
    Leão de Aquino EM; Magalhães LC; Araújo MJ; Chagas de Almeida MC
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 66(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8731319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of agreement between clinic and home-measured blood pressure in the Finnish population: the Finn-HOME Study.
    Niiranen TJ; Jula AM; Kantola IM; Reunanen A
    J Hypertens; 2006 Aug; 24(8):1549-55. PubMed ID: 16877957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
    Burnier M; Gasser UE
    Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The angiotensin receptor blocker eprosartan mesylate reduces pulse pressure in isolated systolic hypertension.
    Teitelbaum I; Chilvers M; Reiz RJ
    Can J Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 20 Suppl C():11C-16C. PubMed ID: 16807618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who's really hypertensive?--Quality control issues in the assessment of blood pressure for randomized trials.
    Reid CM; Ryan P; Miles H; Willson K; Beilin LJ; Brown MA; Jennings GL; Johnston CI; Macdonald GJ; Marley JE; McNeil JJ; Morgan TO; West MJ; Wing LM
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16036492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.