These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16733341)

  • 1. Modern psychophysics and the assessment of human oral sensation.
    Snyder DJ; Prescott J; Bartoshuk LM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006; 63():221-241. PubMed ID: 16733341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The psychophysics of taste.
    Bartoshuk LM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1978 Jun; 31(6):1068-77. PubMed ID: 352127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.
    Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Green BG; Hoffman HJ; Ko CW; Lucchina LA; Marks LE; Snyder DJ; Weiffenbach JM
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Aug; 82(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15234598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical isolation of the modality responsible for detecting multimodal stimuli: a chemosensory example.
    Nagata H; Dalton P; Doolittle N; Breslin PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 15709866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.
    Duffy VB; Peterson JM; Bartoshuk LM
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2-3):435-45. PubMed ID: 15276808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neurocognitive bases of human multimodal food perception: sensory integration.
    Verhagen JV; Engelen L
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2006; 30(5):613-50. PubMed ID: 16457886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception.
    Bartoshuk LM
    Chem Senses; 2000 Aug; 25(4):447-60. PubMed ID: 10944509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection and modulation of capsaicin perception in the human oral cavity.
    Smutzer G; Jacob JC; Tran JT; Shah DI; Gambhir S; Devassy RK; Tran EB; Hoang BT; McCune JF
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():120-131. PubMed ID: 29751045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumental and sensory quantification of oral coatings retained after swallowing semi-solid foods.
    Prinz JF; Huntjens L; de Wijk RA
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(12):1071-9. PubMed ID: 17045954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lipid deposition on the tongue after oral processing of medium-chain triglycerides and impact on the perception of mouthfeel.
    Pivk U; Godinot N; Keller C; Antille N; Juillerat MA; Raspor P
    J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Feb; 56(3):1058-64. PubMed ID: 18173239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysics: a journey from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Bartoshuk LM
    Appetite; 2004 Aug; 43(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 15262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oral perception of bolus in healthy young women.
    Miyaoka S; Ashida I; Miyaoka Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):870-80. PubMed ID: 18712209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses by humans to oral chemical irritants as a function of locus of stimulation.
    Lawless HT; Stevens DA
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jan; 43(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 3340502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface sensibility of the floor of the mouth and tongue in healthy controls and in radiated patients.
    Aviv JE; Hecht C; Weinberg H; Dalton JF; Urken ML
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1992 Sep; 107(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 1408228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of saliva on physical food properties in fat texture perception.
    Kupirovič UP; Elmadfa I; Juillerat MA; Raspor P
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Apr; 57(6):1061-1077. PubMed ID: 27172255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [One solution to the problem of basic psychophysical law and sensory scaling].
    Leonidov AV
    Biofizika; 1991; 36(4):708-13. PubMed ID: 1793757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale.
    Kalva JJ; Sims CA; Puentes LA; Snyder DJ; Bartoshuk LM
    J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S238-45. PubMed ID: 24422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chemogenic Subqualities of Mouthfeel.
    Simons CT; Klein AH; Carstens E
    Chem Senses; 2019 May; 44(5):281-288. PubMed ID: 31039245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misconceptions about classical psychophysics and the measurement of response bias.
    Gardner RM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Apr; 84(2):587-94. PubMed ID: 9106852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taste damage (otitis media, tonsillectomy and head and neck cancer), oral sensations and BMI.
    Bartoshuk LM; Catalanotto F; Hoffman H; Logan H; Snyder DJ
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Nov; 107(4):516-26. PubMed ID: 22728784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.