127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16733761)
1. Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Kornprat P; Werkgartner G; Cerwenka H; Bacher H; El-Shabrawi A; Rehak P; Mischinger HJ
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2006 Jun; 391(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 16733761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Zhou HX; Guo YH; Yu XF; Bao SY; Liu JL; Zhang Y; Ren YG
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2006 Feb; 5(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 16481296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study.
Lomanto D; Cheah WK; So JB; Goh PM
Arch Surg; 2001 Oct; 136(10):1106-8. PubMed ID: 11585499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ruurda JP; Visser PL; Broeders IA
Comput Aided Surg; 2003; 8(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 14708755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.
Hüscher CG; Lirici MM; Di Paola M; Crafa F; Napolitano C; Mereu A; Recher A; Corradi A; Amini M
Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):442-51. PubMed ID: 12399846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
Ruurda JP; Broeders IA; Simmermacher RP; Borel Rinkes IH; Van Vroonhoven TJ
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12008761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations.
Vidovszky TJ; Smith W; Ghosh J; Ali MR
J Surg Res; 2006 Dec; 136(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 17059837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical characteristics of remote Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 40 cases.
Zhou HX; Guo YH; Yu XF; Bao SY; Liu JL; Zhang Y; Ren YG; Zheng Q
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 12(16):2606-9. PubMed ID: 16688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis.
Buzad FA; Corne LM; Brown TC; Fagin RS; Hebert AE; Kaczmarek CA; Pack AN; Payne TN
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Sep; 9(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 23640914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Goh PM; Lomanto D; So JB
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):216-7. PubMed ID: 11961647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial Mayo Clinic Scottsdale experience.
Miller DW; Schlinkert RT; Schlinkert DK
Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Sep; 79(9):1132-6. PubMed ID: 15357034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience on 29 patients.
Caratozzolo E; Recordare A; Massani M; Bonariol L; Jelmoni A; Antoniutti M; Bassi N
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2005; 12(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 15868084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital.
Vuilleumier H; Halkic N
Swiss Med Wkly; 2003 Jun; 133(23-24):347-9. PubMed ID: 12923686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with remote zeus surgical robotic system: report of 16 cases].
Zhou HX; Yu XF; Li FR; Bao SY; Liu JL; Zhang Y; Ren YG; Wei AS; Zheng Q; Huang JQ; Li SQ; Zeng LF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 15854456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.
Breitenstein S; Nocito A; Puhan M; Held U; Weber M; Clavien PA
Ann Surg; 2008 Jun; 247(6):987-93. PubMed ID: 18520226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using standard straight instruments: a surgeon's early experience.
Garcia-Henriquez N; Shah SR; Kane TD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 21476928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?
Kraft BM; Jäger C; Kraft K; Leibl BJ; Bittner R
Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1216-23. PubMed ID: 15457381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transumbilical multiple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUMP-LC): a prospective analysis of 50 initial patients.
Roy P; De A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Apr; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 20374010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.
Nio D; Bemelman WA; Busch OR; Vrouenraets BC; Gouma DJ
Surg Endosc; 2004 Mar; 18(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14716538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.
Lehnert M; Richter B; Beyer PA; Heller K
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Aug; 41(8):1392-6. PubMed ID: 16863843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
