These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16734149)
21. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Today's Solutions for Edentulous Patients: Implants, Digital Dentures, and Streamlined Technologies. Little D Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2016 Jun; 38(6):408-410. PubMed ID: 28570086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Making multiple predictable single-unit provisional restorations using an indirect technique. Hansen PA; Sigler E; Husemann RH J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 19782829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Aesthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary central incisors: predictable laboratory sequence. Weber MR Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 20(9):559-62. PubMed ID: 19113012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. van der Zel JM J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fabricating a fixed partial denture with CAD/CAM technology. Jun SK; Kellam J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 19(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 17511122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. CEREC and Invisalign: how the technologies complement each other. McFarland B Dent Today; 2007 Aug; 26(8):104, 106-7. PubMed ID: 17847908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results. Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Application of functionally generated path technique in computer-aided-design modeling of occlusal surface of full crown]. Zou B; Lü PJ; Ye SY; Wang Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 41(10):631-3. PubMed ID: 17129457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study. Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration. Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Rudolph H; Luthardt RG; Walter MH Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 16844107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team. McLaren EA; Culp L; White S Dent Today; 2008 Sep; 27(9):112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 18807959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]