172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16735184)
1. Correcting the effects of background microcirculation in the measurement of arterial input functions using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI of the brain.
Thornton RJ; Jones JY; Wang ZJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):619-23. PubMed ID: 16735184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voxel-specific brain arterial input functions from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and blind deconvolution in a group of healthy males.
Nordli H; Taxt T; Moen G; Grüner R
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 20192895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward fully automated processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI for acute ischemic cerebral stroke.
Kim J; Leira EC; Callison RC; Ludwig B; Moritani T; Magnotta VA; Madsen MT
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 20060614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimising the effects of bolus dispersion in bolus-tracking MRI.
Willats L; Connelly A; Calamante F
NMR Biomed; 2008 Nov; 21(10):1126-37. PubMed ID: 18727165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T.
Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images.
Chen JJ; Frayne R; Smith MR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1251-63. PubMed ID: 15798320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonlinear DeltaR*2 effects in perfusion quantification using bolus-tracking MRI.
Calamante F; Connelly A; van Osch MJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Feb; 61(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 19161169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions.
Ashton E; Raunig D; Ng C; Kelcz F; McShane T; Evelhoch J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 18777526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. T2* effects in the dual-sequence method for high-dose first-pass myocardial perfusion.
Gatehouse P; Lyne J; Smith G; Pennell D; Firmin D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1168-71. PubMed ID: 17031839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion.
Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.
Ibaraki M; Shimosegawa E; Toyoshima H; Takahashi K; Miura S; Kanno I
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2005 Mar; 25(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 15674238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
