136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16735191)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of microstructure transition in stainless steel.
Peeters JM; van Faassen EE; Bakker CJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):663-72. PubMed ID: 16735191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow in porous metallic materials: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
Xu S; Harel E; Michalak DJ; Crawford CW; Budker D; Pines A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1299-302. PubMed ID: 18972341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of phase transitions in nitinol.
Peeters JM; van Faassen EE; Bakker CJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Mar; 80(4):938-45. PubMed ID: 17075800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental and computational analyses of the effects of slice distortion from a metallic sphere in an MRI phantom.
Hopper TA; Vasilić B; Pope JM; Jones CE; Epstein CL; Song HK; Wehrli FW
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(8):1077-85. PubMed ID: 16997078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR-imaging of the TMJ: artefacts caused by dental alloys.
Behr M; Fellner C; Bayreuther G; Leibrock A; Held P; Fellner F; Handel G
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Sep; 4(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 9171016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of low-strain thermo-mechanical processing on grain boundary network characteristics in type 304 austenitic stainless steel.
Engelberg DL; Humphreys FJ; Marrow TJ
J Microsc; 2008 Jun; 230(Pt 3):435-44. PubMed ID: 18503670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced Overhauser contrast in proton-electron double-resonance imaging of the formation of an alginate hydrogel.
Barros W; Engelsberg M
J Magn Reson; 2007 Jan; 184(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 17049287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic field perturbation of neural recording and stimulating microelectrodes.
Martinez-Santiesteban FM; Swanson SD; Noll DC; Anderson DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2073-88. PubMed ID: 17404456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of mechanical deformation on magnetic properties and MRI artifacts of type 304 and type 316L stainless steel.
Bendel LP; Shellock FG; Steckel M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(6):1170-3. PubMed ID: 9400866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bonding of autopolymerizing acrylic resins to magnetic stainless steel alloys using metal conditioner.
Shimizu H; Tsue F; Chen ZX; Kawaguchi T; Takahashi Y
J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 18191011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force-deflection properties of initial orthodontic archwires.
Quintão CC; Cal-Neto JP; Menezes LM; Elias CN
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19388430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic field interactions of orthodontic wires during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 Tesla.
Klocke A; Kemper J; Schulze D; Adam G; Kahl-Nieke B
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 16044226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow imaging of fluids in porous media by magnetization prepared centric-scan SPRITE.
Li L; Chen Q; Marble AE; Romero-Zerón L; Newling B; Balcom BJ
J Magn Reson; 2009 Mar; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19121591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distortion-free magnetic resonance imaging in the zero-field limit.
Kelso N; Lee SK; Bouchard LS; Demas V; Mück M; Pines A; Clarke J
J Magn Reson; 2009 Oct; 200(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 19664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A perspective on needle artifacts in MRI: an electromagnetic model for experimentally separating susceptibility effects.
Glowinski A; Adam G; Bücker A; van Vaals J; Günther RW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Dec; 19(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 11212373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-temperature and high-pressure in situ SCC device for synchrotron radiation diffraction experiments and application using an austenitic stainless steel.
Yamamoto A; Nakahigashi S; Terasawa M; Mitamura T; Akiniwa Y; Yamada T; Liu L; Shobu T; Tsubakino H
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2006 Jan; 13(Pt 1):14-8. PubMed ID: 16371704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image correction during large and rapid B(0) variations in an open MRI system with permanent magnets using navigator echoes and phase compensation.
Li J; Wang Y; Jiang Y; Xie H; Li G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 27(7):988-93. PubMed ID: 19369023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
