These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16735259)

  • 1. Assessment of newborn screening parent education materials.
    Arnold CL; Davis TC; Frempong JO; Humiston SG; Bocchini A; Kennen EM; Lloyd-Puryear M
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5 Pt 2):S320-5. PubMed ID: 16735259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials.
    Singh J
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2003; 30(5):867-70. PubMed ID: 12949600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness and complexity of information available to parents from newborn-screening programs.
    Fant KE; Clark SJ; Kemper AR
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):1268-72. PubMed ID: 15867034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures.
    Freda MC
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 15867830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.
    Amini H; Casamassimo PS; Lin HL; Hayes JR
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18027780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infant hearing screening: stakeholder recommendations for parent-centered communication.
    Arnold CL; Davis TC; Humiston SG; Bocchini JA; Bass PF; Bocchini A; Kennen EM; White K; Forsman I
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5 Pt 2):S341-54. PubMed ID: 16735261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parent comprehension of polio vaccine information pamphlets.
    Davis TC; Bocchini JA; Fredrickson D; Arnold C; Mayeaux EJ; Murphy PW; Jackson RH; Hanna N; Paterson M
    Pediatrics; 1996 Jun; 97(6 Pt 1):804-10. PubMed ID: 8657518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts.
    Davis TC; Humiston SG; Arnold CL; Bocchini JA; Bass PF; Kennen EM; Bocchini A; Kyler P; Lloyd-Puryear M
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5 Pt 2):S326-40. PubMed ID: 16735260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are end-of-life patient education materials readable?
    Ache KA; Wallace LS
    Palliat Med; 2009 Sep; 23(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 19460831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure.
    Michielutte R; Bahnson J; Dignan MB; Schroeder EM
    J Cancer Educ; 1992; 7(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 1419592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.
    Zion AB; Aiman J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 74(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 2586962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The readability of HIV/AIDS education materials.
    Singh J
    AIDS Educ Prev; 2000 Jun; 12(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 10926125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations.
    Wilson M
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.
    Boles CD; Liu Y; November-Rider D
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Feb; 90(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 26896514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials.
    Weintraub D; Maliski SL; Fink A; Choe S; Litwin MS
    Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Nov; 55(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 15530765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing readability of patient information materials.
    Spadaro DC; Robinson LA; Smith LT
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Feb; 37(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 7361793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations.
    Hill-Briggs F; Smith AS
    Diabetes Care; 2008 Apr; 31(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 18202245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsuitable readability levels of patient information pertaining to dementia and related diseases: a comparative analysis.
    Weih M; Reinhold A; Richter-Schmidinger T; Sulimma AK; Klein H; Kornhuber J
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2008 Dec; 20(6):1116-23. PubMed ID: 18588726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Over-the-counter ovulation prediction devices: do accompanying instructions adhere to low-literacy guidelines?
    Homewood VJ; Zite NB; Wallace LS
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Aug; 54(8):473-7. PubMed ID: 19769191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.