These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16735911)

  • 1. Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
    Gubbels SP; McMenomey SO
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Jun; 116(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16735911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeon JH; Bae MR; Chang JW; Choi JY
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Aug; 39(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 21889279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.
    Majdani O; Leinung M; Rau T; Akbarian A; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 19041512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Deneuve S; Loundon N; Leboulanger N; Rouillon I; Garabedian EN
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):789-190. PubMed ID: 18667941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.
    Heller JW; Brackmann DE; Tucci DL; Nyenhuis JA; Chou CK
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 8892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification.
    Kumar R; Lerski RA; Gandy S; Clift BA; Abboud RJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1799-802. PubMed ID: 16838376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biophysics of cochlear implant/MRI interactions emphasizing bone biomechanical properties.
    Sonnenburg RE; Wackym PA; Yoganandan N; Firszt JB; Prost RW; Pintar FA
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Oct; 112(10):1720-5. PubMed ID: 12368603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focused tight dressing does not prevent cochlear implant magnet migration under 1.5 Tesla MRI.
    Cuda D; Murri A; Succo G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2013 Apr; 33(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 23853406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.
    Carlson ML; Neff BA; Link MJ; Lane JI; Watson RE; McGee KP; Bernstein MA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 25931165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Guidelines for the performance of MRI in patients with cochlear implants].
    Dubrulle F; Vincent C; Varoquaux A; Ernst O; Veillon F
    J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 92(10):872-7. PubMed ID: 22000608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical strength of reconstruction plates when used for medial support of MED-El cochlear implants: implications for diagnostic MRI.
    Poetker DM; Wackym PA; Yoganandan N; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB; Pintar FA
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 16432305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnet removal and reinsertion in a cochlear implant recipient undergoing brain MRI.
    Migirov L; Wolf M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2013; 75(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 23364345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnet dislocation: an increasing and serious complication following MRI in patients with cochlear implants.
    Hassepass F; Stabenau V; Arndt S; Beck R; Bulla S; Grauvogel T; Aschendorff A
    Rofo; 2014 Jul; 186(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 24497090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision surgery due to magnet dislocation in cochlear implant patients: an emerging complication.
    Hassepass F; Stabenau V; Maier W; Arndt S; Laszig R; Beck R; Aschendorff A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jan; 35(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 24270727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Safety of MR Conditional Cochlear Implant at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].
    Takahashi D; Ogura A; Hayashi N; Seino S; Kawai R; Matsuda T; Doi T; Tsuchihashi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):674-80. PubMed ID: 27546081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BAHA devices and magnetic resonance imaging scanners.
    Fritsch MH; Naumann IC; Mosier KM
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1095-9. PubMed ID: 18636027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.