460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16736984)
1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: clinical and economic benefits.
Rader M
Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):16-21. PubMed ID: 16736984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pegfilgrastim: a recent advance in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Waladkhani AR
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2004 Sep; 13(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 15305906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pegfilgrastim use during chemotherapy: current and future applications.
Wolf T; Densmore JJ
Curr Hematol Rep; 2004 Nov; 3(6):419-23. PubMed ID: 15496275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim on febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia and bone pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Pinto L; Liu Z; Doan Q; Bernal M; Dubois R; Lyman G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Sep; 23(9):2283-95. PubMed ID: 17697451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of primary prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia within community practices in the US.
Hershman D; Hurley D; Wong M; Morrison VA; Malin JL
J Med Econ; 2009 Sep; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19723018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
André N; Kababri ME; Bertrand P; Rome A; Coze C; Gentet JC; Bernard JL
Anticancer Drugs; 2007 Mar; 18(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 17264759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Dale DC
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 1(11):679-84. PubMed ID: 16258470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of hospitalization for neutropenic complications of chemotherapy in patients with primary solid tumors receiving pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.
Weycker D; Malin J; Kim J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1069-81. PubMed ID: 19539108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment and guidelines for first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Crawford J
Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):22-8. PubMed ID: 16736985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: evidence based review.
Bhana N
Curr Opin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 19(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 17545795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis.
von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Skacel T; Lyman GH; Pousa AL; Bacon P; Easton V; Aapro MS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):608-17. PubMed ID: 19110415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to support delivery of chemotherapy: twenty years of clinical experience.
Renwick W; Pettengell R; Green M
BioDrugs; 2009; 23(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 19627169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Granulocytic growth factors and cancer-related neutropenia: limited effects.
Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):189-91. PubMed ID: 17128529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use and effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in primary prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in the outpatient setting.
Tuffaha HW; Treish IM; Zaru L
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2008 Sep; 14(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 18524866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
Aapro M; Schwenkglenks M; Lyman GH; Lopez Pousa A; Lawrinson S; Skacel T; Bacon P; von Minckwitz G
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2010 Jun; 74(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19748281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia: review of current guidelines.
Heuser M; Ganser A; Bokemeyer C; ; ;
Semin Hematol; 2007 Jul; 44(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 17631179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
