These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16738295)
1. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade. Kimberger O; Fischer L; Plank C; Mayer N Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 16738295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Callender modification of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces the risk of tooth-blade contact in children. Mireskandari SM; Askarizadeh N; Darabi ME; Rahimi E; Ataee HA; Chamrami F; Eghtesadi-Araghi P Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18950325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact. Lee J; Choi JH; Lee YK; Kim ES; Kwon OK; Hastings RH Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 14766698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children? Varghese E; Kundu R Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 24690084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Determination of the distance between the upper incisors and the laryngoscope blade during laryngoscopy: comparisons of the McCoy, the Macintosh, the Miller, and the Belscope blades]. Bito H; Nishiyama T; Higarhizawa T; Sakai T; Konishi A Masui; 1998 Oct; 47(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 9834604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical comparison of the Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes for laryngeal exposure in anesthetized adults. Cheung RW; Irwin MG; Law BC; Chan CK Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 16428574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades. Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of the modified laryngoscopic blade for training novice laryngoscopists. Lee J; Kim BS; Chang HW; Lee Y J Clin Anesth; 2005 Aug; 17(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 16102681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Pentax-AWS improves laryngeal view compared with Macintosh blade during laryngoscopy and facilitates easier intubation]. Suzuki A; Toyama Y; Katsumi N; Sasaki R; Hirota K; Matsumoto H; Takahata O; Iwasaki H Masui; 2007 Apr; 56(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 17441461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Airway risk factors for the Miller laryngoscope blade. Landry WB; Nossaman BD J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():62-7. PubMed ID: 27555135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new universal laryngoscope blade: a preliminary comparison with Macintosh laryngoscope blades. Gerlach K; Wenzel V; von Knobelsdorff G; Steinfath M; Dörges V Resuscitation; 2003 Apr; 57(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12668301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Miller Straight Blade and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients. Ratajczyk P; Kluj P; Szmyd B; Resch J; Hogendorf P; Durczynski A; Gaszynski T J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade. Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients. Asai T; Matsumoto S; Fujise K; Johmura S; Shingu K Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 12644417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Straight blades improve visualization of the larynx while curved blades increase ease of intubation: a comparison of the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Belscope and Lee-Fiberview blades. Arino JJ; Velasco JM; Gasco C; Lopez-Timoneda F Can J Anaesth; 2003 May; 50(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 12734161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neonates and infants. Singh R; Singh P; Vajifdar H Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Apr; 19(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 19335346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the Macintosh curved blade size on direct laryngoscopic view in edentulous patients. Kim H; Chang JE; Han SH; Lee JM; Yoon S; Hwang JY Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):120-123. PubMed ID: 28974373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preanesthetic assessment data do not influence the time for tracheal intubation with Airtraq™ video laryngoscope in obese patients. Ranieri D; Zinelli FR; Neubauer AG; Schneider AP; do Nascimento P Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 24907879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients. Abdallah R; Galway U; You J; Kurz A; Sessler DI; Doyle DJ Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1082-7. PubMed ID: 21918156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]