176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16738631)
1. Upending the zeitgeist.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7093):572-3. PubMed ID: 16738631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Value creation and sharing among universities, biotechnology and pharma.
Edwards MG; Murray F; Yu R
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):618-24. PubMed ID: 12776145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing university roles in the century of biotechnology.
Meagher LR; Bolivar F
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):598-9. PubMed ID: 9661170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ontario.
Hoag H
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):676-7. PubMed ID: 15800632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patenting the obvious?
Check E
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7140):16-7. PubMed ID: 17476235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Universities could gain from backing biotech.
Kamb A
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):113. PubMed ID: 12634753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Calling for entrepreneurs: London.
Smaglik P
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1281-2. PubMed ID: 12454679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementing links between industry and the university.
Jennings R
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16 Suppl():35-6. PubMed ID: 9591263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Business: stepping out.
Dalton R
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):146. PubMed ID: 18337794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Boston: a magnetic hub.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2002 May; 417(6886):4-5. PubMed ID: 12015552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tech transfer revs up.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):13. PubMed ID: 16404380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fresh horizons South Korea.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6916):4-5. PubMed ID: 12478244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canadian lab loses Amgen backing.
Knight J
Nature; 2002 May; 417(6884):4. PubMed ID: 11986629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Leaders and laggards in the stem cell enterprise.
Herrera S
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):775-7. PubMed ID: 16003350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The technology trap.
Gewin V
Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):948-9. PubMed ID: 16222269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Danish biotech centre faces axe.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):105. PubMed ID: 12634749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Almost in bloom.
Marris E
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):122-4. PubMed ID: 18396501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biotechnology at Yale.
Shiao S
Yale J Biol Med; 2001; 74(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 11501716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biotechnology update: news and views.
Debaets AM
Ethics Med; 2005; 21(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 16475278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Northern England: rising star.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6956):430-3. PubMed ID: 14508497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
