These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16738821)

  • 1. Juggling land retirement objectives on an agricultural landscape: coordination, conflict, or compromise?
    Marshall EP; Homans FR
    Environ Manage; 2006 Jul; 38(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16738821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trade-off analysis in the Northern Andes to study the dynamics in agricultural land use.
    Stoorvogel JJ; Antle JM; Crissman CC
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Aug; 72(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 15246571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural non-point source pollution control through land retirement.
    Luo B; Li JB; Huang GH; Li HL
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 361(1-3):38-56. PubMed ID: 16242757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicriteria model for planning agricultural regions within a context of groundwater rational management.
    Manos B; Papathanasiou J; Bournaris T; Voudouris K
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1593-600. PubMed ID: 20371401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons.
    Groot JC; Rossing WA; Tichit M; Turpin N; Jellema A; Baudry J; Verburg PH; Doyen L; van de Ven GW
    J Environ Manage; 2009 May; 90 Suppl 2():S147-60. PubMed ID: 19136197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: an easement implementation tool.
    Strager MP; Rosenberger RS
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 16580124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landscape changes in agrarian landscapes in the 1990s: the interaction between farmers and the farmed landscape. A case study from Jutland, Denmark.
    Kristensen LS; Thenail C; Kristensen SP
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Jul; 71(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 15158286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards a planning support system for environmental management and agri-environmental measures--the Colorfields study.
    Paar P; Röhricht W; Schuler J
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Nov; 89(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 17767997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance and functions of European grasslands.
    Carlier L; De Vliegher A; Van Cleemput O; Boeckx P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 16363357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling hydrological effects of wetland restoration: a differentiated view.
    Staes J; Rubarenzya MH; Meire P; Willems P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 19213997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning.
    Ligtenberg A; Wachowicz M; Bregt AK; Beulens A; Kettenis DL
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Aug; 72(1-2):43-55. PubMed ID: 15246573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An inexact fuzzy two-stage stochastic model for quantifying the efficiency of nonpoint source effluent trading under uncertainty.
    Luo B; Maqsood I; Huang GH; Yin YY; Han DJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Jul; 347(1-3):21-34. PubMed ID: 16084964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial modeling of harvest constraints on wood supply versus wildlife habitat objectives.
    Rempel RS; Kaufmann CK
    Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):334-47. PubMed ID: 14753619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Terrestrial metapopulation dynamics: a nonlinear bioeconomic model analysis.
    Groeneveld R; Weikard HP
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Feb; 78(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 16137820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indivisibility and divisibility in land development over time and under uncertainty.
    Batabyal AA; Yoo SJ
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jul; 76(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 15939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling land use change and environmental impact.
    Veldkamp A; Verburg PH
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Aug; 72(1-2):1-3. PubMed ID: 15246569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change.
    Evans TP; Kelley H
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Aug; 72(1-2):57-72. PubMed ID: 15246574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current use of impact models for agri-environment schemes and potential for improvements of policy design and assessment.
    Primdahl J; Vesterager JP; Finn JA; Vlahos G; Kristensen L; Vejre H
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1245-54. PubMed ID: 20199842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of landscape protection on farm management and farmers' income in Norway.
    Mittenzwei K; Lien G; Fjellstad W; Ovren E; Dramstad W
    J Environ Manage; 2010; 91(4):861-8. PubMed ID: 20022160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.