432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16739450)
1. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
Servedio MR; Lande R
Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation.
Verzijden MN; Lachlan RF; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2005 Oct; 59(10):2097-108. PubMed ID: 16405155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
Servedio MR
Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual selection by male choice in monogamous and polygynous human populations.
Ihara Y; Aoki K
Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Feb; 55(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 9925810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
Rowell JT; Servedio MR
Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
Neff BD; Pitcher TE
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed.
Kokko H; Mappes J
Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1876-85. PubMed ID: 16261726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes.
McLain DK
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1085-95. PubMed ID: 16136806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice.
Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
Nat Rev Genet; 2006 Sep; 7(9):681-92. PubMed ID: 16921346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable female preferences drive complex male displays.
Coleman SW; Patricelli GL; Borgia G
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):742-5. PubMed ID: 15085130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection by male choice.
Nakahashi W
Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Sep; 74(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 18621070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies.
Tramm NA; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 18485111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can cytoplasmic incompatibility inducing Wolbachia promote the evolution of mate preferences?
Champion de Crespigny FE; Butlin RK; Wedell N
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 16033569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
