These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16739678)

  • 1. Multitrait-multimethod investigation of a novel body image measurement technique.
    Rowe DA; McDonald SM; Mahar MT; Raedeke TD
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2005 Dec; 76(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 16739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of body image satisfaction using computer manipulation of a digital image.
    Sands R; Maschette W; Armatas C
    J Psychol; 2004 Jul; 138(4):325-37. PubMed ID: 15379009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a new figural drawing scale for body-image assessment: the BIAS-BD.
    Gardner RM; Jappe LM; Gardner L
    J Clin Psychol; 2009 Jan; 65(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 19051276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further investigation of the validity and reliability of the photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment.
    Swami V; Stieger S; Harris AS; Nader IW; Pietschnig J; Voracek M; Tovée MJ
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 22375603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale.
    Thompson MA; Gray JJ
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Apr; 64(2):258-69. PubMed ID: 7722852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new visual image rating scale for females: correlations with measures of relative fatness, weight dissatisfaction, and body-esteem.
    Goldberg JP; Bailey SM; Lenart EB; Koff E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1075-84. PubMed ID: 8823874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Stunkard's figure rating scale adapted into Portuguese.
    Scagliusi FB; Alvarenga M; Polacow VO; Cordás TA; de Oliveira Queiroz GK; Coelho D; Philippi ST; Lancha AH
    Appetite; 2006 Jul; 47(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16750589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability and construct validity of Contour Drawing Rating Scale scores in a sample of early adolescent girls.
    Wertheim EH; Paxton SJ; Tilgner L
    Body Image; 2004 May; 1(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 18089152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of 3-dimensional body scans for body-image research.
    Domina T; Heuberger R; MacGillivray M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Apr; 106(2):653-8. PubMed ID: 18556919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a new body image assessment scale in urban Cameroon: an anthropological approach.
    Cohen E; Pasquet P
    Ethn Dis; 2011; 21(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 21942160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What have the difference scores not been telling us? A critique of the use of self--ideal discrepancy in the assessment of body image and evaluation of an alternative data-analytic framework.
    Cafri G; van den Berg P; Brannick MT
    Assessment; 2010 Sep; 17(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 20040721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the Conditional Goal Setting in Eating Disorders Scale (CGS-EDS) among adults with eating disorders.
    Watson HJ; Street H; Raykos BC; Byrne SM; Fursland A; Nathan PR
    Eat Behav; 2010 Apr; 11(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 20188295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit internalization of the thin ideal as a predictor of increases in weight, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating.
    Juarascio AS; Forman EM; Timko CA; Herbert JD; Butryn M; Lowe M
    Eat Behav; 2011 Aug; 12(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21741019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of subjective measures of body image disturbance.
    Mizes JS; Heffner M; Madison JK; Varnado-Sullivan P
    Eat Behav; 2004 Jan; 5(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15000954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond Campbell and Fiske: assessment of convergent and discriminant validity.
    Lowe NK; Ryan-Wenger NM
    Res Nurs Health; 1992 Feb; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1579653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-year temporal stability and predictive and incremental validity of the body, eating, and exercise comparison orientation measure (BEECOM) among college women.
    Fitzsimmons-Craft EE; Bardone-Cone AM
    Body Image; 2014 Jan; 11(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24120182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underlying dimensions and psychometric properties of the Eating Behaviors and Body Image Test for preadolescent girls.
    Candy CM; Fee VE
    J Clin Child Psychol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 9561944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construct validity of dimensions of adaptive behavior: a multitrait-multimethod evaluation.
    Widaman KF; Stacy AW; Borthwick-Duffy SA
    Am J Ment Retard; 1993 Sep; 98(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8398082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nine, seven, five, or three: how many figures do we need for assessing body image?
    Ambrosi-Randić N; Pokrajac-Bulian A; Taksić V
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Apr; 100(2):488-92. PubMed ID: 15974359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a body image assessment procedure for children and preadolescents.
    Veron-Guidry S; Williamson DA
    Int J Eat Disord; 1996 Nov; 20(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 8912041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.