These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16739681)

  • 1. Reliability of heart rate responses at given ratings of perceived exertion in cycling and walking.
    Katsanos CS; Moffatt RJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2005 Dec; 76(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 16739681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heart rate and metabolic responses to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise: a comparison of graded walking and ungraded jogging at a constant perceived exertion.
    Kilpatrick MW; Kraemer RR; Quigley EJ; Mears JL; Powers JM; Dedea AJ; Ferrer NF
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Mar; 27(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 19204846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of heart rate and session rating of perceived exertion methods of defining exercise load in cyclists.
    Rodríguez-Marroyo JA; Villa G; García-López J; Foster C
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2249-57. PubMed ID: 21997452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A learning protocol improves the validity of the Borg 6-20 RPE scale during indoor cycling.
    Soriano-Maldonado A; Romero L; Femia P; Roero C; Ruiz JR; Gutierrez A
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 May; 35(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 24165960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physiological responses to wrist weights during endurance cycling in normal subjects.
    Sagiv M; Rotstein A; Ben-Sira D; Grodjinovsky A; Fisher N; Kaufmann D
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Jun; 23(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 1886485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of music on work-rate distribution during a cycling time trial.
    Atkinson G; Wilson D; Eubank M
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Nov; 25(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 15532005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulation effects of prior exercise intensity feedback by the Borg scale during open-loop cycling.
    Pires FO; Hammond J
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 46(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21266335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optic flow influences perceived exertion during cycling.
    Parry D; Chinnasamy C; Micklewright D
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2012 Aug; 34(4):444-56. PubMed ID: 22889688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis.
    Chen MJ; Fan X; Moe ST
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of Omni scale of perceived exertion during prolonged cycling.
    Utter AC; Kang J; Nieman DC; Dumke CL; McAnulty SR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Apr; 38(4):780-6. PubMed ID: 16679997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of deception and expected exercise duration on psychological and physiological variables during treadmill running and cycling.
    Eston R; Stansfield R; Westoby P; Parfitt G
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 22220852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of stride frequency on metabolic costs and rating of perceived exertion during walking in water.
    Masumoto K; Nishizaki Y; Hamada A
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 23332190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests.
    Borg E; Kaijser L
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Feb; 16(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 16430682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of terminal RPE on session RPE.
    Hornsby JH; Green JM; O'Neal EK; Killen LL; McIntosh JR; Coates TE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Oct; 27(10):2800-5. PubMed ID: 23302757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it possible to individualize intensity of eccentric cycling exercise from perceived exertion on concentric test?
    Laroche D; Joussain C; Espagnac C; Morisset C; Tordi N; Gremeaux V; Casillas JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1621-1627.e1. PubMed ID: 23270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children.
    Leung ML; Chung PK; Leung RW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1047-62. PubMed ID: 12578245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological and psychological responses to outdoor vs. laboratory cycling.
    Mieras ME; Heesch MW; Slivka DR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2324-9. PubMed ID: 24476776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients.
    Schmidt K; Vogt L; Thiel C; Jäger E; Banzer W
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Jul; 34(7):631-6. PubMed ID: 23444095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability of a 30-min fixed perceived effort cycling exercise.
    O'Malley CA; Fullerton CL; Mauger AR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2023 Apr; 123(4):721-735. PubMed ID: 36436029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of walking at self-preferred and maximal speed in patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome.
    Horemans HL; Beelen A; Nollet F; Lankhorst GJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 85(12):1929-32. PubMed ID: 15605328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.