143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16739803)
1. Relative accuracy testing of an X-ray fluorescence-based mercury monitor at coal-fired boilers.
Hay KJ; Johnsen BE; Ginochio PR; Cooper JA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 May; 56(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 16739803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion.
Otero-Rey JR; López-Vilariño JM; Moreda-Piñeiro J; Alonso-Rodríguez E; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; López-Mahía P; Prada-Rodríguez D
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5262-7. PubMed ID: 14655716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In situ optical absorption mercury continuous emission monitor.
Thiebaud J; Thomson MJ; Mani R; Morrow WH; Morris EA; Jia CQ
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9294-9. PubMed ID: 19924898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speciation and mass-balance of mercury from pulverized coal fired power plants burning western Canadian subbituminous coals.
Goodarzi F
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 15480492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Behavior of mercury emissions from a commercial coal-fired power plant: the relationship between stack speciation and near-field plume measurements.
Landis MS; Ryan JV; ter Schure AF; Laudal D
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13540-8. PubMed ID: 25325168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atmospheric emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007.
Tian H; Wang Y; Xue Z; Qu Y; Chai F; Hao J
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jul; 409(16):3078-81. PubMed ID: 21621816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan.
Ito S; Yokoyama T; Asakura K
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):397-402. PubMed ID: 16225907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury.
Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J
Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():863-870. PubMed ID: 28779897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method to assess mercury emissions: a study of three coal-fired electric-generating power station configurations.
Boylan HM; Cain RD; Kingston HM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Nov; 53(11):1318-25. PubMed ID: 14649751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric mercury concentrations emitted from a coal-fired power plant in Mexico.
García GF; Álvarez HB; Echeverría RS; de Alba SR; Rueda VM; Dosantos EC; Cruz GV
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):973-985. PubMed ID: 28498787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
Tian H; Wang Y; Cheng K; Qu Y; Hao J; Xue Z; Chai F
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 22696807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the emission factors for potentially toxic elements from coal-fired boilers and sintering furnaces in a steel production plant.
Mutuku JK; Lee YY; Huang BW; Chen WH; Hou WC
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148329. PubMed ID: 34465047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of mercury in rock varnish samples in areas impacted by coal-fired power plants.
Nowinski P; Hodge VF; Gerstenberger S; Cizdziel JV
Environ Pollut; 2013 Aug; 179():132-7. PubMed ID: 23669462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
Hu Y; Cheng H
Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mobility and contamination assessment of mercury in coal fly ash, atmospheric deposition, and soil collected from Tianjin, China.
Wei Z; Wu G; Su R; Li C; Liang P
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 21713969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
Meij R; te Winkel H
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of mercury speciation and removal through air pollution control devices of a 190 MW boiler.
Wu C; Cao Y; Dong Z; Cheng C; Li H; Pan W
J Environ Sci (China); 2010; 22(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 20397418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal Trend and Spatial Distribution of Speciated Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in China During 1978-2014.
Wu Q; Wang S; Li G; Liang S; Lin CJ; Wang Y; Cai S; Liu K; Hao J
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(24):13428-13435. PubMed ID: 27993067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mercury emissions from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea.
Jun Lee S; Seo YC; Jurng J; Hong JH; Park JW; Hyun JE; Gyu Lee T
Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun; 325(1-3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15144786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
