These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16740466)

  • 1. The Soterion Rapid Triage System: evaluation of inter-rater reliability and validity.
    Maningas PA; Hime DA; Parker DE; McMurry TA
    J Emerg Med; 2006 May; 30(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 16740466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of the Soterion Rapid Triage System in children presenting to the Emergency Department.
    Maningas PA; Hime DA; Parker DE
    J Emerg Med; 2006 Nov; 31(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 17046473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.
    Baumann MR; Strout TD
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 12(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 15741584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study.
    van der Wulp I; van Baar ME; Schrijvers AJ
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Jul; 25(7):431-4. PubMed ID: 18573959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emergency triage: comparing a novel computer triage program with standard triage.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Colman I; Blitz S; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jun; 12(6):502-7. PubMed ID: 15930400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater agreement of the triage system RETTS-HEV.
    Nissen L; Kirkegaard H; Perez N; Hørlyk U; Larsen LP
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2014 Feb; 21(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 23797391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of computerized emergency triage.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 13(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16495428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Akhmetshin E; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17200513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of two four-level emergency triage systems.
    Parenti N; Ferrara L; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Sangiorgi D; Lenzi T
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 19282762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Manchester Triage System provides good reliability in an Australian emergency department.
    Grouse AI; Bishop RO; Bannon AM
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jul; 26(7):484-6. PubMed ID: 19546267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of the Toowoomba adult trauma triage tool: a Queensland, Australia study.
    Wollaston A; Fahey P; McKay M; Hegney D; Miller P; Wollaston J
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2004 Oct; 12(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 15474348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity comparison of two five-level triage acuity scales.
    Worster A; Fernandes CM; Eva K; Upadhye S
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Aug; 14(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 17620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying high-risk patients for triage and resource allocation in the ED.
    Ruger JP; Lewis LM; Richter CJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):794-8. PubMed ID: 17870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triage nurses validly and reliably estimate emergency department patient complexity.
    Vance J; Sprivulis P
    Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Aug; 17(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 16091102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient dependency in the emergency department (ED): reliability and validity of the Jones Dependency Tool (JDT).
    Crouch R; Williams S
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 2006 Oct; 14(4):219-29. PubMed ID: 16904323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of an Italian four-level emergency triage system.
    Parenti N; Manfredi R; Bacchi Reggiani ML; Sangiorgi D; Lenzi T
    Emerg Med J; 2010 Jul; 27(7):495-8. PubMed ID: 20584948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage.
    Göransson K; Ehrenberg A; Marklund B; Ehnfors M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Dec; 19(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 16324070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerised five-level triage system.
    Ng CJ; Yen ZS; Tsai JC; Chen LC; Lin SJ; Sang YY; Chen JC;
    Emerg Med J; 2011 Dec; 28(12):1026-31. PubMed ID: 21076055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): a new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine.
    Widgren BR; Jourak M
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Jun; 40(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 18930373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triage with the French Emergency Nurses Classification in Hospital scale: reliability and validity.
    Taboulet P; Moreira V; Haas L; Porcher R; Braganca A; Fontaine JP; Poncet MC
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 19194114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.