These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16741499)
1. Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review. Grivell L EMBO Rep; 2006 Jun; 7(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 16741499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it. Frishauf P Medscape J Med; 2008; 10(11):267. PubMed ID: 19099017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting to yes: the fate of neuroradiology manuscripts rejected by radiology over a 2-year period. Khosla A; McDonald RJ; Bornmann L; Kallmes DF Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 21697305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing? Berger E Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 16435419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From the editors' desk: peer review now and in the future. Kravitz RL; Feldman MD J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Dec; 26(12):1385-90. PubMed ID: 21971601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A reviewer's lot is not a happy one. Raine CS J Neuroimmunol; 2003 Aug; 141(1-2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12965247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Would you buy a used car from this editor? Nazarian LN J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1107-8. PubMed ID: 23804332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial: Transparency Must Prevail. Bernard C eNeuro; 2017; 4(5):. PubMed ID: 28932810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication. Muir-Cochrane E Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. Balistreri WF J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Expediting peer review: why say yes. Quan SF J Clin Sleep Med; 2014 Nov; 10(11):1167. PubMed ID: 25325582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: does it work? Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing the costs of peer review. Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]