364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16741634)
1. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators.
Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.
Dahl LC; Brimacombe CA; Lindsay DS
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 18810615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating investigators: examining the impact of eyewitness identification evidence on student-investigators.
Boyce MA; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 18060486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions?
McCallum NA; Brewer N
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Wright DB
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes.
Rodriguez DN; Berry MA
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
Clark SE
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Police lineups of the future?
Brewer N; Weber N; Guerin N
Am Psychol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 30998024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the diagnostic utility of facial composites: beliefs of guilt can bias perceived similarity between composite and suspect.
Charman SD; Gregory AH; Carlucci M
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):76-90. PubMed ID: 19309218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
Clark SE; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Altruistic Lying in an Alibi Corroboration Context: The Effects of Liking, Compliance, and Relationship between Suspects and Witnesses.
Marion SB; Burke TM
Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jan; 35(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 28008653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions.
Lindsay DS; Nilsen E; Read JD
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 11105479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential causes of racial disparities in wrongful convictions based on mistaken identifications: Own-race bias and differences in evidence-based suspicion.
Katzman J; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 36931847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
