These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16741664)
1. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography. Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories. Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer]. Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming]. Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help? Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Malich A; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(12):2454-9. PubMed ID: 11734939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology]. Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial experience of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and ultrasound elastography in predicting breast cancer subtypes and staging. Wang XL; Tao L; Zhou XL; Wei H; Sun JW Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():130-135. PubMed ID: 27718417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Baum F; Fischer U; Obenauer S; Grabbe E Eur Radiol; 2002 Dec; 12(12):3015-7. PubMed ID: 12439584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography]. Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing]. Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers. Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography for detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Scaranelo AM; Crystal P; Bukhanov K; Helbich TH Can Assoc Radiol J; 2010 Jun; 61(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 20137883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial. Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uptake and washout of 99mTcV-dimercaptosuccinic acid and 99mTc-sestamibi in the assessment of histological type and grade in breast cancer. Papantoniou V; Christodoulidou J; Papadaki E; Valotassiou V; Souvatzoglou M; Louvrou A; Feida H; Sotiropoulou M; Pampouras G; Michalas S; Zerva C Nucl Med Commun; 2002 May; 23(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 11973487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]