These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16741789)

  • 1. A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.
    Kloot RW; Radakovich B; Huang X; Brantley DD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):275-87. PubMed ID: 16741789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments.
    Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of commercially available Escherichia coli enumeration tests: implications for attaining water quality standards.
    Hamilton WP; Kim M; Thackston EL
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):4869-78. PubMed ID: 16313941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of culturable fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters.
    Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Servais P
    Can J Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 53(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 17668040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
    Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the dry-weather tidal cycling of fecal indicator bacteria in surface waters of an intertidal wetland.
    Sanders BF; Arega F; Sutula M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3394-408. PubMed ID: 16051310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Guam's streams.
    Fujioka R; Sian-Denton C; Borja M; Castro J; Morphew K
    J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 85 Suppl 1():83S-89S. PubMed ID: 21182696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison study of membrane filtration direct count and an automated coliform and Escherichia coli detection system for on-site water quality testing.
    Habash M; Johns R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Oct; 79(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 19703500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enterococcus and Escherichia coli fecal source apportionment with microbial source tracking genetic markers--is it feasible?
    Wang D; Farnleitner AH; Field KG; Green HC; Shanks OC; Boehm AB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6849-61. PubMed ID: 23890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
    Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolation of fecal coliform bacteria from the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin centrata).
    Harwood VJ; Butler J; Parrish D; Wagner V
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Feb; 65(2):865-7. PubMed ID: 9925633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A long-term study comparing membrane filtration with Colilert defined substrates in detecting fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in natural waters.
    Buckalew DW; Hartman LJ; Grimsley GA; Martin AE; Register KM
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16338057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversity of Salmonella spp. and fungi in northern Greek rivers and their correlation to fecal pollution indicators.
    Arvanitidou M; Kanellou K; Vagiona DG
    Environ Res; 2005 Oct; 99(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 16194678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria.
    Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of in-stream reservoirs to reduce bacterial contamination of rural watersheds.
    Gannon VP; Duke GD; Thomas JE; Vanleeuwen J; Byrne J; Johnson D; Kienzle SW; Little J; Graham T; Selinger B
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Sep; 348(1-3):19-31. PubMed ID: 16162311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffuse and point pollution impacts on the pathogen indicator organism level in the Geum River, Korea.
    Kim G; Choi E; Lee D
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Nov; 350(1-3):94-105. PubMed ID: 16227076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marine bacteria cause false-positive results in the Colilert-18 rapid identification test for Escherichia coli in Florida waters.
    Pisciotta JM; Rath DF; Stanek PA; Flanery DM; Harwood VJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Feb; 68(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 11823188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray method.
    Aulenbach BT
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Feb; 161(1-4):147-59. PubMed ID: 19165613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antimicrobial resistance of fecal bacteria in waters of the Seine river watershed (France).
    Servais P; Passerat J
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 19853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.