These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16741809)

  • 1. Monitoring biofilm thickness using a non-destructive, on-line, electrical capacitance technique.
    Maurício R; Dias CJ; Santana F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Aug; 119(1-3):599-607. PubMed ID: 16741809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of biocide efficacy by photoacoustic biofilm monitoring.
    Schmid T; Panne U; Adams J; Niessner R
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(5):1189-96. PubMed ID: 14975652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biofilm monitoring: a perfect solution in search of a problem.
    Lewandowski Z; Beyenal H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):9-18. PubMed ID: 12701900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-line biofilm monitoring by "BIOX" electrochemical probe.
    Mollica A; Cristiani P
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):45-9. PubMed ID: 12701905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biofouling assessment using an infrared monitor.
    Tinham P; Bott TR
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):39-43. PubMed ID: 12701904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-line monitoring of biofilm formation in a brewery water pipeline system with a fibre optical device.
    Tamachkiarow L; Flemming HC
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):19-24. PubMed ID: 12701901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of biofilm processes and the meaning of steady state in biofilm reactors.
    Lewandowski Z; Beyenal H; Stookey D
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):359-64. PubMed ID: 15303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic response of biofilm to pipe surface and fluid velocity.
    Cloete TE; Westaard D; van Vuuren SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12701907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of attached bacteria and biofilm on double-layer capacitance during biofilm monitoring by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
    Kim T; Kang J; Lee JH; Yoon J
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(15):4615-22. PubMed ID: 21762943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microsensor measurement of oxygen concentration in biofilms: from one dimension to three dimensions.
    Yu T; de la Rosa C; Lu R
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):353-8. PubMed ID: 15303761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of shear force on the biofilm structure and performance of a membrane biofilm reactor for tertiary hydrogen-driven denitrification of municipal wastewater.
    Celmer D; Oleszkiewicz JA; Cicek N
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3057-65. PubMed ID: 18396310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In situ characterization of nitrifying biofilm: minimizing biomass loss and preserving perspective.
    Delatolla R; Tufenkji N; Comeau Y; Lamarre D; Gadbois A; Berk D
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1775-87. PubMed ID: 19217138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Portable pilot plant for evaluating marine biofouling growth and control in heat exchangers-condensers.
    Casanueva JF; Sánchez J; García-Morales JL; Casanueva-Robles T; López JA; Portela JR; Nebot E; Sales D
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):99-104. PubMed ID: 12701913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring of biofilm aging in a Sphingomonas sp. strain from public drinking water sites through changes in capacitance.
    Gulati P; Singh P; Chatterjee AK; Ghosh M
    Environ Technol; 2017 Sep; 38(18):2344-2351. PubMed ID: 27838956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinetics of biodegradation of phenolic wastewater in a biofilm reactor.
    Lin YH; Hsien TY
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1703-11. PubMed ID: 19448304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring of biofilm reactors using natural fluorescence fingerprints.
    Wolf G; Almeida JS; Crespo JG; Reis MA
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):161-7. PubMed ID: 12701923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring biofilm formation by using cyclic voltammetry-effect of the experimental conditions on biofilm removal and activity.
    Gião MS; Montenegro MI; Vieira MJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):51-6. PubMed ID: 12701906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visualisation of transient processes in biofilms by optical coherence tomography.
    Haisch C; Niessner R
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17462698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the use of electrical resistivity imaging technique for improving CH(4) and CO(2) emission rate estimations in landfills.
    Georgaki I; Soupios P; Sakkas N; Ververidis F; Trantas E; Vallianatos F; Manios T
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(2-3):522-31. PubMed ID: 17936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rotating disk electrodes to assess river biofilm thickness and elasticity.
    Boulêtreau S; Charcosset JY; Gamby J; Lyautey E; Mastrorillo S; Azémar F; Moulin F; Tribollet B; Garabetian F
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(3):1347-57. PubMed ID: 21074237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.