BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1674892)

  • 1. The impact of judicial review of patients' refusal to accept antipsychotic medications at the Minnesota Security Hospital.
    Farnsworth MG
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1674892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
    Binder RL; McNiel DE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First year of Maryland's new CRP statute in one state hospital.
    Storch DD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 8148510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right to refuse treatment: impact of Rivers v. Katz.
    Ciccone JR; Tokoli JF; Clements CD; Gift TE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 2372578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Minnesota Advance Psychiatric Directive. Protecting patient decision making.
    Dixon G
    Minn Med; 1992 Dec; 75(12):33-4. PubMed ID: 1361651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication. State laws.
    Arkin HR
    JAMA; 1984 Nov; 252(18):2620-1. PubMed ID: 6149323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consequences of involuntary treatment.
    Hassenfeld IN
    Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The treatment review panel: a solution to treatment refusal?
    Zito JM; Lentz SL; Routt WW; Olson GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 6151858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner: preliminary empirical findings and comparisons.
    Hoge SK; Gutheil TG; Kaplan E
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2893647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect.
    Appelbaum PS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical and judicial perceptions of the risks associated with use of antipsychotic medication.
    Bursztajn H; Chanowitz B; Kaplan E; Gutheil TG; Hamm RM; Alexander V
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 1685680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
    Ledwith DM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
    Mossman D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary administration of medication in the community: the judicial opportunity.
    Schmidt MJ; Geller JL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 2571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
    Goff ML
    Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the right to refuse treatment in a forensic patient population: six-month review.
    Miller RD; Bernstein MR; Van Rybroek GJ; Maier GJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 2758115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What constitutes a psychiatric emergency: clinical and legal dimensions.
    Swartz MS
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 3427231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.