116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16749269)
1. The effect of compression on clinical diagnosis of glaucoma based on non-analyzed confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy images.
Abràmoff MD
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2006; 37(3):263; author reply 263-4. PubMed ID: 16749269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging of the optic disk in caring for patients with glaucoma: ophthalmoscopy and photography remain the gold standard.
Spaeth GL; Reddy SC
Surv Ophthalmol; 2014; 59(4):454-8. PubMed ID: 24856360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography.
Correnti AJ; Wollstein G; Price LL; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1499-505. PubMed ID: 12917163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between stereophotographic and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy measurements of cup/disc ratio: effect on a predictive model for glaucoma development.
Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Vasile C; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 17473732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pilot study to detect glaucoma with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography in a community health screening.
Ohkubo S; Takeda H; Higashide T; Sasaki T; Sugiyama K
J Glaucoma; 2007 Sep; 16(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 17873714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three types of images for the detection of retinal nerve fiber layer defects.
Bae HW; Lee N; Kim CY; Choi M; Hong S; Seong GJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 25785526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodal retinal image registration for optic disk segmentation.
Chrástek R; Skokan M; Kubecka L; Wolf M; Donath K; Jan J; Michelson G; Niemann H
Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 15472744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing optic nerve head analysis between confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Roberti G; Centofanti M; Oddone F; Tanga L; Michelessi M; Manni G
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Oct; 39(10):1026-32. PubMed ID: 24655001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma.
Badalà F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Raoof DA; Leeprechanon N; Law SK; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):724-32. PubMed ID: 17868631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer imaging by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Ye C; To E; Weinreb RN; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
Ophthalmology; 2011 Nov; 118(11):2196-202. PubMed ID: 21762989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors.
Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Berry CC; Smith AR; Dirkes KA; Liebmann JM; Brandt JD; Trick G; Cioffi GA; Coleman AL; Piltz-Seymour JR; Gordon MO; Kass MA;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 14962409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of compression on clinical diagnosis of glaucoma based on non-analyzed confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy images.
Bélair ML; Fansi AK; Descovich D; Leblanc AR; Harasymowycz P
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 16156150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study.
Ervin JC; Lemij HG; Mills RP; Quigley HA; Thompson HW; Burgoyne CF
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):467-81. PubMed ID: 11874747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image analysis in glaucoma.
Cooper RL
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1997 Aug; 25(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 9296290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis. American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jul; 106(7):1414-24. PubMed ID: 10406631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma.
Medeiros FA; Ng D; Zangwill LM; Sample PA; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):214-22. PubMed ID: 17197535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment.
Deleón-Ortega JE; Arthur SN; McGwin G; Xie A; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3374-80. PubMed ID: 16877405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver variability of optic disk variables measured by confocal scanning laser tomography.
Iester M; Mikelberg FS; Courtright P; Burk RO; Caprioli J; Jonas JB; Weinreb RN; Zangwill L
Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 132(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11438054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement of measurement of parapapillary atrophy with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and planimetry of photographs.
Kono Y; Jonas JB; Zangwill L; Berry CC; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 10209726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and scanning laser polarimetry in open angle glaucoma.
Sihota R; Gulati V; Saxena R; Agarwal HC; Sharma AK
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 13(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 12747648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
