These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16751088)

  • 1. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A lost generation.
    Weinberg RA
    Cell; 2006 Jul; 126(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 16839866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.
    Fields H
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jan; 63(1):124. PubMed ID: 17474111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomedical research: a culture in crisis?
    Feldman EL
    Nat Clin Pract Neurol; 2005 Dec; 1(2):61. PubMed ID: 16932493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of research funding in academic medicine.
    Campbell EG
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1482-3. PubMed ID: 19357403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The NIH stimulus--the recovery act and biomedical research.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Apr; 360(15):1479-81. PubMed ID: 19357402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigator balkanization.
    Johnston SC; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Sep; 64(3):A11-2. PubMed ID: 18825670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications.
    Ley TJ; Hamilton BH
    Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5907):1472-4. PubMed ID: 19056961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why China needs an NIH.
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):679. PubMed ID: 15085093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The NIH, research institutions and industry: working together on a shared goal.
    Omary MB
    Gastroenterology; 2007 May; 132(5):1647-50. PubMed ID: 17484859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review at National Institutes of Health: small steps forward.
    Johnston SC; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):A15-7. PubMed ID: 19067350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disappointment in slow-down for biomedical funding.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):559. PubMed ID: 15729751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data sharing: making headway in a competitive research milieu.
    Samson K
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Jul; 64(1):A13-6. PubMed ID: 18668610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The NIH roadmap: timing is everything.
    Williams DA
    Mol Ther; 2005 Feb; 11(2):173. PubMed ID: 15668128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux.
    Munger K
    Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomedical research: facing the opposition.
    Check E
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):17-9. PubMed ID: 16672943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Good news and bad news.
    Garrison H; Bartholme N
    Physiologist; 2006 Aug; 49(4):201, 203-5. PubMed ID: 16915995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A metareview at the NIH.
    Nat Med; 2008 Apr; 14(4):351. PubMed ID: 18391922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.