BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16751153)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of basal insulin from a US health system perspective: comparative analyses of detemir, glargine, and NPH.
    Valentine WJ; Palmer AJ; Erny-Albrecht KM; Ray JA; Cobden D; Foos V; Lurati FM; Roze S
    Adv Ther; 2006; 23(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 16751153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin for type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Canadian payer setting: modeling analysis.
    Tunis SL; Minshall ME; Conner C; McCormick JI; Kapor J; Yale JF; Groleau D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 May; 25(5):1273-84. PubMed ID: 19366302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of detemir-based basal/bolus therapy versus NPH-based basal/bolus therapy for type 1 diabetes in a UK setting: an economic analysis based on meta-analysis results of four clinical trials.
    Palmer AJ; Roze S; Valentine WJ; Smith I; Wittrup-Jensen KU
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Nov; 20(11):1729-46. PubMed ID: 15537473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Waugh N; Cummins E; Royle P; Clar C; Marien M; Richter B; Philip S
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jul; 14(36):1-248. PubMed ID: 20646668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin based on a 10-year simulation of long-term complications with the Diabetes Mellitus Model in patients with type 2 diabetes in Switzerland.
    Brändle M; Azoulay M; Greiner RA
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Apr; 45(4):203-20. PubMed ID: 17474539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, modeling the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycemic control in Switzerland.
    Brändle M; Azoulay M; Greiner RA
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Mar; 49(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 21329624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Therapy conversion to insulin detemir among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents: a modeling study of cost-effectiveness in the United States.
    Valentine WJ; Erny-Albrecht KM; Ray JA; Roze S; Cobden D; Palmer AJ
    Adv Ther; 2007; 24(2):273-90. PubMed ID: 17565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of therapy conversion to insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany: a modelling study of long-term clinical and cost outcomes.
    Valentine WJ; Goodall G; Aagren M; Nielsen S; Palmer AJ; Erny-Albrecht K
    Adv Ther; 2008 Jun; 25(6):567-84. PubMed ID: 18568451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir versus NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes in Sweden.
    Smith-Palmer J; Fajardo-Montañana C; Pollock RF; Ericsson A; Valentine WJ
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(5):977-86. PubMed ID: 22563742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling cost effectiveness of insulin glargine for the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes in Canada.
    Grima DT; Thompson MF; Sauriol L
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 17335310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review and economic evaluation of a long-acting insulin analogue, insulin glargine.
    Warren E; Weatherley-Jones E; Chilcott J; Beverley C
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Nov; 8(45):iii, 1-57. PubMed ID: 15525480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Glargine Versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes in Thailand.
    Permsuwan U; Chaiyakunapruk N; Dilokthornsakul P; Thavorn K; Saokaew S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 26961276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health economic evaluation of insulin glargine vs NPH insulin in intensified conventional therapy for type 1 diabetes in Germany.
    Pfohl M; Schädlich PK; Dippel FW; Koltermann KC
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 2():14-27. PubMed ID: 22812690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes using a basal-bolus regimen in five European countries.
    Gschwend MH; Aagren M; Valentine WJ
    J Med Econ; 2009 Jun; 12(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 19545216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Horvath K; Jeitler K; Berghold A; Ebrahim SH; Gratzer TW; Plank J; Kaiser T; Pieber TR; Siebenhofer A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):CD005613. PubMed ID: 17443605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changing basal insulin from NPH to detemir or glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and a history of severe hypoglycemia.
    Johansen OE; Vanberg PJ; Kilhovd BK; Jørgensen AP
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2009; 5(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 19436668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
    Ridderstråle M; Jensen MM; Gjesing RP; Niskanen L
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(4):468-78. PubMed ID: 23384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tricco AC; Ashoor HM; Antony J; Beyene J; Veroniki AA; Isaranuwatchai W; Harrington A; Wilson C; Tsouros S; Soobiah C; Yu CH; Hutton B; Hoch JS; Hemmelgarn BR; Moher D; Majumdar SR; Straus SE
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g5459. PubMed ID: 25274009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK: a model of long-term clinical and cost outcomes.
    Ray JA; Boye KS; Yurgin N; Valentine WJ; Roze S; McKendrick J; Tucker DM; Foos V; Palmer AJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Mar; 23(3):609-22. PubMed ID: 17355742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reduced mild hypoglycaemia in subjects with Type 1 diabetes treated with insulin detemir or NPH insulin in Denmark, Sweden, Finland and the Netherlands.
    Valentine WJ; Jendle J; Saraheimo M; Thorsteinsson B; Pollock RF; Lammert M
    Diabet Med; 2012 Mar; 29(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 21951030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.