351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752072)
1. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Home volumetry foretells a new era of self-management for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J; Lette F; Fraser S
Lymphology; 2007 Dec; 40(4):185-7. PubMed ID: 18365533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compression therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized, controlled comparative study of relation between volume and interface pressure changes.
Damstra RJ; Partsch H
J Vasc Surg; 2009 May; 49(5):1256-63. PubMed ID: 19394553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing local tissue edema in postmastectomy lymphedema.
Mayrovitz HN
Lymphology; 2007 Jun; 40(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 17853619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcutaneous oxygen tension in arms of women with unilateral postmastectomy lymphedema.
Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Brown-Cross D; Humen S; Cohen P; Kleinman-Barnett C
Lymphology; 2005 Jun; 38(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 16184817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [New surgical options for patients with secondary lymphedema of the arm who no longer benefit from regular treatment].
Voesten HG; Damstra RJ; Klinkert P
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 May; 152(18):1061-5. PubMed ID: 18547030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphoedema post-mastectomy: is elevation alone an effective treatment?
Swedborg I; Norrefalk JR; Piller NB; Asard C
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1993 Jun; 25(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 8341995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Objective measurement of lymphedema after mastectomy].
Göltner E; Fischbach JU; Mönter B; Kraus A; Vorherr H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jun; 110(24):949-52. PubMed ID: 3996237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of volume displacement versus circumferential arm measurements for lymphoedema: implications for the SNAC trial.
Tewari N; Gill PG; Bochner MA; Kollias J
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):889-93. PubMed ID: 18959643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
