BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752072)

  • 21. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
    Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Standardised measurements used to order compression garments can be used to calculate arm volumes to evaluate lymphoedema treatment.
    Brorson H; Höijer P
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2012 Dec; 46(6):410-5. PubMed ID: 23157502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
    Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
    Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lack of effect of coumarin in women with lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer.
    Loprinzi CL; Kugler JW; Sloan JA; Rooke TW; Quella SK; Novotny P; Mowat RB; Michalak JC; Stella PJ; Levitt R; Tschetter LK; Windschitl H
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Feb; 340(5):346-50. PubMed ID: 9929524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voluminometric estimation of the degree of lymphedema and its therapy by pneumatic compression.
    Swedborg I
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1977; 9(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 594690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduce breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema? A pilot study.
    Teas J; Cunningham JE; Cone L; Jansen K; Raghavan SK; Nitcheva DK; Xie D; Butler WM
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Nov; 13(9):1008-18. PubMed ID: 15665658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low intensity resistance exercise for breast cancer patients with arm lymphedema with or without compression sleeve.
    Johansson K; Tibe K; Weibull A; Newton RC
    Lymphology; 2005 Dec; 38(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 16515225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitivity and specificity of combined perimetric and volumetric evaluations in the diagnosis of arm lymphedema.
    Godoy JM; Silva SH; Godoy MF
    Prague Med Rep; 2007; 108(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 18399061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mechanical lymphatic drainage in the treatment of arm lymphedema.
    Bordin NA; Guerreiro Godoy Mde F; Pereira de Godoy JM
    Indian J Cancer; 2009; 46(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 19749466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative bioimpedance spectroscopy for the assessment of lymphoedema.
    Ward LC; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Oct; 117(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 19082708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel, validated method to quantify breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) following bilateral breast surgery.
    Miller CL; Specht MC; Horick N; Skolny MN; Jammallo LS; O'Toole J; Taghian AG
    Lymphology; 2013 Jun; 46(2):64-74. PubMed ID: 24354105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomized study comparing manual lymph drainage with sequential pneumatic compression for treatment of postoperative arm lymphedema.
    Johansson K; Lie E; Ekdahl C; Lindfeldt J
    Lymphology; 1998 Jun; 31(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 9664269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
    Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
    Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pole walking for patients with breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
    Jönsson C; Johansson K
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2009 Apr; 25(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 19384736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foot volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement.
    Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Litwin B; Pfister S
    Lymphology; 2005 Mar; 38(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15856683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements as a means of characterizing localized tissue water in arms of women with and without breast cancer treatment related lymphedema.
    Mayrovitz HN; Weingrad DN; Davey S
    Lymphology; 2014 Sep; 47(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 25420307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
    McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors associated with increased breast cancer-related lymphedema volume.
    Vignes S; Arrault M; Dupuy A
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(8):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17851861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter-rater reliability of arm circumference measurement.
    Foroughi N; Dylke ES; Paterson RD; Sparrow KA; Fan J; Warwick EB; Kilbreath SL
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2011; 9(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 21688979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.