These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752259)

  • 1. No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy--a preliminary study.
    Oscarsson U; Poromaa IS; Nüssler E; Löfgren M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 16752259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study.
    Härkki-Sirén P; Sjöberg J; Toivonen J; Tiitinen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Oct; 79(10):866-71. PubMed ID: 11304971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
    Schwartz RO
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases.
    Erian J; Hassan M; Pachydakis A; Chandakas S; Wissa I; Hill N
    BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 18410659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates.
    Summitt RL; Stovall TG; Steege JF; Lipscomb GH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 9721763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
    Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy: a controlled study of clinical and functional outcomes.
    Loh FH; Koa RC
    Singapore Med J; 2002 Aug; 43(8):403-7. PubMed ID: 12507025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lift-laparoscopic total hysterectomy as a routine procedure.
    Kruschinski D; Homburg S; Wöckel A; Kapur A; Reich H
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():147-56. PubMed ID: 15744685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy?
    Lowell L; Kessler AA
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Sep; 45(9):738-42. PubMed ID: 11027083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intramyometrial injection of vasopressin in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
    Ghomi A; Makhlouf F; Kasturi S; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18312990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Diab AE; Abdul-Latif EE; Eldash M; Mahdy MS; Shalaby H; Shafik M
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1597-600. PubMed ID: 18998008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy of postoperative continuous local anesthetic infusion at the iliac crest bone graft site after posterior spinal arthrodesis: a minimum of 4-year follow-up.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Kuo E; Campbell M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2790-6. PubMed ID: 18245999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.
    Braga M; Frasson M; Vignali A; Zuliani W; Capretti G; Di Carlo V
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Apr; 50(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 17195085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
    Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1.
    Tollund L; Hansen B; Kjer JJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(9):1138-41. PubMed ID: 16929423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.