These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752580)

  • 1. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum.
    Dobbins JT; Samei E; Ranger NT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1466-75. PubMed ID: 16752581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
    Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.
    Ranger NT; Samei E; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):785-95. PubMed ID: 17517933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the two-dimensional presampled modulation transfer function of digital radiography devices using one-dimensional test objects.
    Wells JR; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6148-60. PubMed ID: 23039654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalization of the modulation transfer function: the open-field approach.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4443-9. PubMed ID: 18975691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DQE of wireless digital detectors: comparative performance with differing filtration schemes.
    Samei E; Murphy S; Christianson O
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081910. PubMed ID: 23927324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.