These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752594)

  • 41. Dissociation of frequency and recency processing from list recall after severe closed head injury in children and adolescents.
    Levin HS; Song J; Scheibel RS; Fletcher JM; Harward HN; Chapman SB
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10649541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect.
    Maddox GB; Pyc MA; Kauffman ZS; Gatewood JD; Schonhoff AM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1376-1388. PubMed ID: 30047090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Returning to the scene: reminders and context reinstatement enhance children's recall.
    Priestley G; Roberts S; Pipe ME
    Dev Psychol; 1999 Jul; 35(4):1006-19. PubMed ID: 10442869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage.
    Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Gong QY; Roberts N; Kapur N
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 15390152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Geraci LD
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of massive repetition on speeded recognition of faces.
    Lewis MB; Ellis HD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1117-42. PubMed ID: 11131816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect.
    Widner RL
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 8556532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring.
    Steffens MC; Buchner A; Martensen H; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1152-64. PubMed ID: 11126938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Differential time-dependent effects of emotion on recollective experience and memory for contextual information.
    Sharot T; Yonelinas AP
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):538-47. PubMed ID: 17451666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The influence of distinctive processing on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Smith RE; Hunt RR
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 10946533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Retrieval-induced forgetting and executive control.
    Román P; Soriano MF; Gómez-Ariza CJ; Bajo MT
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1053-8. PubMed ID: 19656337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fluency and response speed in recognition judgments.
    Poldrack RA; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9046865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect.
    Shao H; Opitz B; Yang J; Weng X
    Memory; 2016; 24(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 25793354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.
    Long DL; Wilson J; Hurley R; Prat CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 16822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Exploring the mental representation underlying familiarity assessment.
    Dopkins S; Sargent J; Ngo CT
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 23046415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An overall decline both in recollection and familiarity in healthy aging.
    Pitarque A; Sales A; Meléndez JC; Mayordomo T; Satorres E
    Psicothema; 2015; 27(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 26493574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.