These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

937 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752599)

  • 1. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks.
    Kunde W; Wühr P
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 16752599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.
    Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 12747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.
    Wühr P; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):705-31. PubMed ID: 16104103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?
    Nieuwenhuis S; Stins JF; Posthuma D; Polderman TJ; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1260-72. PubMed ID: 17225507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial-by-trial modulations in the orienting of attention elicited by gaze and arrow cues.
    Ciardo F; Ricciardelli P; Iani C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):543-556. PubMed ID: 29589789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.
    Hommel B; Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 14752663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective view of the impact of prime validity on response speed and selection in the arrow classification task with free choice trials.
    Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 20139465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):895-911. PubMed ID: 20436188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.
    Olson IR; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1299-313. PubMed ID: 11550756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation.
    Alpay G; Goerke M; Stürmer B
    Psychol Res; 2009 Nov; 73(6):803-16. PubMed ID: 19034499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
    Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.
    Iani C; Rubichi S; Gherri E; Nicoletti R
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 19246350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.
    Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hoffmann J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):800-6. PubMed ID: 17328376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential effects and sequence learning in a three-choice serial reaction time task.
    Lee JC; Beesley T; Livesey EJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():168-76. PubMed ID: 27518835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991).
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ; Simon JR
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):203-9; discussion 210-5. PubMed ID: 8008783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.