1384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16752625)
1. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities].
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA; Geertman ME
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Dec; 109(12):475-80. PubMed ID: 12572098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of the shallow vestibule edentulous mandible with simultaneous split thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty and mandibular endosseous implants for implant-supported overdentures.
Cillo JE; Finn R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 19138614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
