These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16753002)

  • 1. Assessing performance of prediction rules in machine learning.
    Martin R; Yu K
    Pharmacogenomics; 2006 Jun; 7(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 16753002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output.
    Shrestha DL; Solomatine DP
    Neural Netw; 2006 Mar; 19(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 16530384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance and estimation of the true error rate of classification rules built with additional information. An application to a cancer trial.
    Conde D; Salvador B; Rueda C; Fernández MA
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Oct; 12(5):583-602. PubMed ID: 24025649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods.
    Molinaro AM; Simon R; Pfeiffer RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3301-7. PubMed ID: 15905277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality risk score prediction in an elderly population using machine learning.
    Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 177(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 23364879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates.
    Hanczar B; Hua J; Sima C; Weinstein J; Bittner M; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):822-30. PubMed ID: 20130029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis with selection of variables.
    Snapinn SM; Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):289-99. PubMed ID: 2720056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligent quotient estimation of mental retarded people from different psychometric instruments using artificial neural networks.
    Di Nuovo AG; Di Nuovo S; Buono S
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Feb; 54(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 22153923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiments with AdaBoost.RT, an improved boosting scheme for regression.
    Shrestha DL; Solomatine DP
    Neural Comput; 2006 Jul; 18(7):1678-710. PubMed ID: 16764518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
    Jiang W; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adapting prediction error estimates for biased complexity selection in high-dimensional bootstrap samples.
    Binder H; Schumacher M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article12. PubMed ID: 18384265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SemiBoost: boosting for semi-supervised learning.
    Mallapragada PK; Jin R; Jain AK; Liu Y
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Nov; 31(11):2000-14. PubMed ID: 19762927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating misclassification error with small samples via bootstrap cross-validation.
    Fu WJ; Carroll RJ; Wang S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1979-86. PubMed ID: 15691862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein subcellular localization prediction using a hybrid of similarity search and error-correcting output code techniques that produces interpretable results.
    Doderer M; Yoon K; Salinas J; Kwek S
    In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(5):419-33. PubMed ID: 17274771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Superior feature-set ranking for small samples using bolstered error estimation.
    Sima C; Braga-Neto U; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1046-54. PubMed ID: 15514003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some alternatives to asymptotic tests for the analysis of pharmacogenetic data using nonlinear mixed effects models.
    Bertrand J; Comets E; Chenel M; Mentré F
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 22049987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data.
    Wei GC; Tanner MA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1297-309. PubMed ID: 1786320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for sampling from distributions with intractable normalizing constants.
    Liang F; Jin IH
    Neural Comput; 2013 Aug; 25(8):2199-234. PubMed ID: 23607562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.