420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16753361)
21. Robotic partial nephrectomy in the setting of prior abdominal surgery.
Petros FG; Patel MN; Kheterpal E; Siddiqui S; Ross J; Bhandari A; Diaz M; Menon M; Rogers CG
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21176077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures.
Wang AJ; Bhayani SB
Urology; 2009 Feb; 73(2):306-10. PubMed ID: 19038419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre.
Aron M; Koenig P; Kaouk JH; Nguyen MM; Desai MM; Gill IS
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18336600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in octogenarians.
Thomas AA; Aron M; Hernandez AV; Lane BR; Gill IS
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1042-6. PubMed ID: 19683799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: technique and results.
Lattouf JB; Beri A; D'Ambros OF; Grüll M; Leeb K; Janetschek G
Eur Urol; 2008 Aug; 54(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 18440123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience.
Khalifeh A; Autorino R; Hillyer SP; Laydner H; Eyraud R; Panumatrassamee K; Long JA; Kaouk JH
J Urol; 2013 Apr; 189(4):1236-42. PubMed ID: 23079376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes from a single institution.
Cho CL; Ho KL; Chu SS; Tam PC
Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 21282824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for central tumors: analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications.
Nadu A; Kleinmann N; Laufer M; Dotan Z; Winkler H; Ramon J
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):42-7; discussion 47. PubMed ID: 19012908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology.
Shalhav AL; Orvieto MA; Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Zorn KC
Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):508-13. PubMed ID: 16979736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selective renal parenchymal clamping in robotic partial nephrectomy: initial experience.
Viprakasit DP; Altamar HO; Miller NL; Herrell SD
Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):750-3. PubMed ID: 20570318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Ghani KR; Sukumar S; Sammon JD; Rogers CG; Trinh QD; Menon M
J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):907-12. PubMed ID: 24184365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Partial nephrectomy: a contemporary review regarding outcomes and different techniques.
Riggs SB; Larochelle JC; Belldegrun AS
Cancer J; 2008; 14(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 18836334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis.
Panumatrassamee K; Autorino R; Laydner H; Hillyer S; Khalifeh A; Kassab A; Stein RJ; Haber GP; Kaouk JH
Int J Urol; 2013 May; 20(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 23126452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Obesity and morbid obesity are associated with a greater conversion rate to open surgery for standard but not hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
Gabr AH; Elsayed ER; Gdor Y; Roberts WW; Wolf JS
J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2357-62; discussion 2362. PubMed ID: 18930284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for completely intraparenchymal tumors.
Chung BI; Lee UJ; Kamoi K; Canes DA; Aron M; Gill IS
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2182-7. PubMed ID: 22014808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney.
Lane BR; Novick AC; Babineau D; Fergany AF; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):847-51; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 18221958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system.
Simmons MN; Gill IS
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2067-73; discussion 2073. PubMed ID: 17509287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience.
Breda A; Finelli A; Janetschek G; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2009 Apr; 55(4):836-50. PubMed ID: 19168276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
