166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16754450)
1. Rules is rules.
Orr RD
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):40-1; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acting out of ethics: what the open letter asks.
Lunstroth J
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):41-3; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Americans should not be on a game show in U.S. emergency rooms and ambulances.
Grassley C
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 20945261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency research and consent: keeping the exception from undermining the rule.
Derse AR
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):36-7; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unproven or unsatisfactory versus equipoise in emergency research with waived consent.
Spellecy R
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 16754452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An open letter to institutional review boards considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme trial.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 16754441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An open letter to institutional review boards considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme® trial.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):5-8. PubMed ID: 20945260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What treatments are "satisfactory?" divining regulatory intent and an ethical basis for exception to informed consent for emergency research.
Silbergleit R; Watters D; Sayre MR
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):24-6; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The meaning of community consultation.
Schmidt TA; Delorio NM; McClure KB
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):30-2; discussion W46-8. PubMed ID: 16754446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of community consultation in the ethical conduct of research without consent.
Richardson LD; Rhodes R; Ragin DF; Wilets I
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):33-5; discussion W46-50. PubMed ID: 16754447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial-blood study has critics seeing red.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A17. PubMed ID: 16856302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How confidential trial negotiations and agreements between the Food and Drug Administration and sponsors marginalize local institutional review boards, and what to do about it.
Mann H
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):22-4; discussion W49-50. PubMed ID: 16754442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the community consultation requirement necessary?
Sheehan M
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):38-40; discussion W46-8. PubMed ID: 16754449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trials and errors: barriers to oversight of research conducted under the emergency research consent waiver.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
IRB; 2006; 28(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 16770884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood, sweat and tears.
Magnus D
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 16754438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A life and death dilemma..
Coghlan A
New Sci; 2006 Oct 21-27; 192(2574):8-9. PubMed ID: 17165219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood-substitute study is criticized by U.S. agency.
Burton TM
Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A3. PubMed ID: 16578912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Community consultation: not the problem--an important part of the solution.
Dickert NW; Sugarman J
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 16754444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Polyheme and the ethics of informed consent.
McKenna M
Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Nov; 48(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 17061316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A decision analysis of consent.
Baron J
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):46-52. PubMed ID: 16754453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
