155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16754455)
1. Decisions devoid of data?
Halpern SD
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):55-6; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A decision analysis of consent.
Baron J
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):46-52. PubMed ID: 16754453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Against against bioethics.
Hoffmaster CB
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):53-5; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. For bioethics--the role of empirical research.
Jacoby LH
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):58-9; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Some limits of decision-theory in bioethics: rights, ends, and thick concepts.
Latham SR
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):56-8; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis for a new bioethics.
Price CC
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):62-4. PubMed ID: 16754459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilitarian decision analysis of informed consent.
Nord E
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):65-7; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychology and medical decision-making.
Suhler C; Churchland P
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):79-81. PubMed ID: 19998129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics: the intersection of private and public decisions.
Iltis AS
J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 15370300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Kon's reinvention of the empirical bioethics wheel.
Holm S
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):69-70. PubMed ID: 19998123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What empirical research can do for bioethics.
Hoffmaster B; Hooker C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):72-4. PubMed ID: 19998125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision support and moral sensitivity: must one come at the expense of the other?
Gray DE
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):59-62; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hurrah for empirical bioethics (where hermeneutically clarified) or how perception of facts 'depends' on values.
Schultz DS
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):95-9. PubMed ID: 19998136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is buying normative bioethics research?
Tsai AC
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Aug; 8(8):62-3. PubMed ID: 18802870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Empiricism, values, and bioethics.
Kirkwood K
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):91-2. PubMed ID: 19998134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An engine, not a pyramid.
Viso AM; da Rocha AC
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):81-3. PubMed ID: 19998130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trying the case against bioethics.
Gross JA
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):71-3; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A view from the borderlands of philosophical bioethics and empirical social science research: how the 'is' can inform the 'ought'.
Myser C
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):88-91. PubMed ID: 19998133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensible discussion in bioethics: reflections on interdisciplinary research.
Arnason V
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16028546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical experts and Dr. Ethics.
Fielder J
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1993 Dec; 12(4):116-9. PubMed ID: 11655087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
