These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A decision analysis of consent. Baron J Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):46-52. PubMed ID: 16754453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Against against bioethics. Hoffmaster CB Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):53-5; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. For bioethics--the role of empirical research. Jacoby LH Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):58-9; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Some limits of decision-theory in bioethics: rights, ends, and thick concepts. Latham SR Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):56-8; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis for a new bioethics. Price CC Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):62-4. PubMed ID: 16754459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilitarian decision analysis of informed consent. Nord E Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):65-7; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychology and medical decision-making. Suhler C; Churchland P Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):79-81. PubMed ID: 19998129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics: the intersection of private and public decisions. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2004 Aug; 29(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 15370300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Kon's reinvention of the empirical bioethics wheel. Holm S Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):69-70. PubMed ID: 19998123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What empirical research can do for bioethics. Hoffmaster B; Hooker C Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):72-4. PubMed ID: 19998125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision support and moral sensitivity: must one come at the expense of the other? Gray DE Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):59-62; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hurrah for empirical bioethics (where hermeneutically clarified) or how perception of facts 'depends' on values. Schultz DS Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):95-9. PubMed ID: 19998136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is buying normative bioethics research? Tsai AC Am J Bioeth; 2008 Aug; 8(8):62-3. PubMed ID: 18802870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Empiricism, values, and bioethics. Kirkwood K Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):91-2. PubMed ID: 19998134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An engine, not a pyramid. Viso AM; da Rocha AC Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):81-3. PubMed ID: 19998130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trying the case against bioethics. Gross JA Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(3):71-3; discussion W51-3. PubMed ID: 16754463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A view from the borderlands of philosophical bioethics and empirical social science research: how the 'is' can inform the 'ought'. Myser C Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):88-91. PubMed ID: 19998133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensible discussion in bioethics: reflections on interdisciplinary research. Arnason V Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2005; 14(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 16028546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical experts and Dr. Ethics. Fielder J IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1993 Dec; 12(4):116-9. PubMed ID: 11655087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]