202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16755545)
1. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.
Hartung J; Knapp G
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
Saveleva E; Selinski S
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
Borm GF; Donders AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: incorporating the degree of interdependence.
Cheung SF; Chan DK
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 15506860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis.
Rosenberg MS
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):464-8. PubMed ID: 15807430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
