202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16755545)
21. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
Formann AK
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Meta-analysis of method comparison studies.
Williamson PR; Lancaster GA; Craig JV; Smyth RL
Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(14):2013-25. PubMed ID: 12111884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 17715249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
Vaitkus PT; Brar C
Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse.
Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Laird NM; Molenberghs G
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 9544513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
Bürkner PC; Doebler P
Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Experts' views are still needed.
Vandenbroucke JP
BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):469-70; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
Song F; Gilbody S
BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
Jackson D
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity.
Begg CB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.
Baker R; Jackson D
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Darlington GA; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 17942465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of Stata software to test heterogeneity in meta-analysis method].
Wang D; Mou ZY; Zhai JX; Zong HX; Zhao XD
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 29(7):726-9. PubMed ID: 19031771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
