These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16755545)

  • 41. A simulation test of Smith's "Degrees of freedom" correction for comparative studies.
    Nunn CL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Nov; 98(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 8572158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate.
    Seagroatt V; Stratton I
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How to do a meta-analysis.
    Field AP; Gillett R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):665-94. PubMed ID: 20497626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Procedures that assess inconsistency in meta-analyses can assess the likelihood of response bias in multiwave surveys.
    Montori VM; Leung TW; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):856-8. PubMed ID: 16018920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
    Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Statistical power of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints.
    Leon AC; Heo M; Teres JJ; Morikawa T
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1712-23. PubMed ID: 17252534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies.
    Copas J; Jackson D
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 15032784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased.
    Irwig L; Macaskill P; Berry G; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):470; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An empirical investigation of partial effect sizes in meta-analysis of correlational data.
    Aloe AM
    J Gen Psychol; 2014; 141(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 24838020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Copas JB; Malley PF
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4267-78. PubMed ID: 18384185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
    Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A survey of publication bias within evolutionary ecology.
    Cassey P; Ewen JG; Blackburn TM; Møller AP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S451-4. PubMed ID: 15801601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Confidence intervals and P-values for meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17688500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis by P. Macaskill, S. D. Walter and L. Irwig, Statistics in Medicine, 2001; 20:641-654.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1803; author reply 1804. PubMed ID: 12111913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.