These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16755703)
1. The children of ART (assisted reproductive technology): should the law protect them from harm? Rosato JL Utah Law Rev; 2004; 2004(1):57-110. PubMed ID: 16755703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The constitutional implications of human cloning. Foley EP Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the judicial response to an asserted right to reproductive cloning. Lewis JL J Leg Med; 2008; 29(4):523-36. PubMed ID: 19023779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cloning consensus: creating a convention to ban human reproductive cloning. Riordan PJ Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 2003; 26(2):411-44. PubMed ID: 15744900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a constitutional right to clone? Sunstein CR Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):987-1005. PubMed ID: 15508211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cloning human beings and the consumer of the future: a worthwhile endeavor or a nightmare come true? Frankel A Loyola Consum Law Rev; 2001; 13(2):149-87. PubMed ID: 15977332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fathering a child from the grave: what are the inheritance rights of children born through new technology after the death of a parent? VanCannon K Drake Law Rev; 2004; 52(2):331-62. PubMed ID: 16755696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Not without my father: the legal status of the posthumously conceived child. Scharman CA Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 55(3):1001-54. PubMed ID: 15164750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning? Vinck SC J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Governmental control of research in positive eugenics. Bass IS Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1974; 7(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 11661095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The year of the stem cell: George Annas talks about the future of stem cell research in America. Byravan S Genewatch; 2005; 18(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 16538768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A look at the rights and entitlements of posthumously conceived children: no surefire way to tame the reproductive Wild West. Scott MW Emory Law J; 2003; 52(2):963-96. PubMed ID: 15295835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Don't rush to judgment on "Dolly": human cloning and its individual procreative liberty implications. Moore DL UMKC Law Rev; 1997; 66(2):425-49. PubMed ID: 16273689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal responses to the potential cloning of human beings. Forster H; Ramsey E Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):433-67. PubMed ID: 12710442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cloning without human clones. Wadman M Wall St J (East Ed); 1998 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Civil rights of the institutionalized. Bayh Be Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Feb; 126(30):S1707-47. PubMed ID: 11665218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals. Wadlington WJ Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Will we follow the sheep? Kluger J Time; 1997 Mar; 149(10):67, 70-72. PubMed ID: 11654876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The prospect of cloning human beings: has knowledge leapt ahead of wisdom? Scheckel P DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999; 2(3):605-38. PubMed ID: 11658075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]